logo
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

4 Pages123>»
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Coops  
#1 Posted : 31 January 2013 03:35:35(UTC)
Coops

Rank: Member of the Brotherhood

Groups: Registered
Joined: 25/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 448
Location: Xiberia

Thanks: 34 times
Was thanked: 611 time(s) in 456 post(s)
New Order a New Order tribute act, apparently

Without a trace of irony, too.
thanks 1 user thanked Coops for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 31/01/2013(UTC)
Sponsor
Eimi  
#2 Posted : 31 January 2013 04:18:26(UTC)
Eimi

Rank: Member of the Movement

Groups: Registered
Joined: 29/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 688
Woman
Location: Japan

Thanks: 528 times
Was thanked: 875 time(s) in 688 post(s)
Coops wrote:
New Order a New Order tribute act, apparently

Without a trace of irony, too.

Blah blah blah.....no matter what he says, New Order are New Order.
thanks 2 users thanked Eimi for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 31/01/2013(UTC), Biginoil on 01/02/2013(UTC)
Hellbent  
#3 Posted : 31 January 2013 17:29:47(UTC)
Hellbent

Rank: Candidate

Groups: Registered
Joined: 31/01/2013(UTC)
Posts: 3
Location: US, Asshole!

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 3 time(s) in 3 post(s)
leather-girl wrote:
Coops wrote:
New Order a New Order tribute act, apparently

Without a trace of irony, too.

Blah blah blah.....no matter what he says, New Order are New Order.


I saw them in NYC in October and while I would have loved that Hooky was with them, they were still rocking - not a tribute band at all (and I have seen plenty of tired alternative acts clearly doing it for the money in recent years)
thanks 1 user thanked Hellbent for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 01/02/2013(UTC)
Volturno  
#4 Posted : 31 January 2013 19:38:32(UTC)
Volturno

Rank: Member of the Village

Groups: Registered
Joined: 29/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 86
Location: Rio de Janeiro

Thanks: 17 times
Was thanked: 97 time(s) in 87 post(s)
leather-girl wrote:
Coops wrote:
New Order a New Order tribute act, apparently

Without a trace of irony, too.

Blah blah blah.....no matter what he says, New Order are New Order.

One has to be irrationally anti-Hooky to say so. Even Barney knows they can't be New Order, they can't write music with the same quality without Hooky.

Barney, Steve and co. are cashing out to retire and never think about playing live ever again. Not that they're wrong, though, they're all nearing their 60s.
Hooky is trying to do the same thing, but he seems to have managed his money way worse than Barney has, judging by the latter's yacht and SLK. Hence Hooky working his ass off, which is something I'll always admire in a person. Hooky, legally an ex-member of New Order, has a smaller cut than the rest in NewOrderNow, which is what he's fighting in court for. I don't see him winning anytime soon, and I bet that will drain most of the money he's making right now.
They will all remain bitter enemies until they're older, the new record is out and the court fight has been resolved. Then, Barney (and maybe Steve too) will write his own memories of both JD and NO in addition to Hooky's, and that's the only thing I can look forward to.
thanks 1 user thanked Volturno for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 01/02/2013(UTC)
Eimi  
#5 Posted : 31 January 2013 23:47:51(UTC)
Eimi

Rank: Member of the Movement

Groups: Registered
Joined: 29/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 688
Woman
Location: Japan

Thanks: 528 times
Was thanked: 875 time(s) in 688 post(s)
All I was trying to say is that the current New Order are New Order, even if they have 3/4ths of the original or 'classic' lineup. I don't think they are merely a tribute band, and I'm sure I'm not the only fan in the world who thinks this.
thanks 1 user thanked Eimi for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 01/02/2013(UTC)
Eimi  
#6 Posted : 31 January 2013 23:58:48(UTC)
Eimi

Rank: Member of the Movement

Groups: Registered
Joined: 29/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 688
Woman
Location: Japan

Thanks: 528 times
Was thanked: 875 time(s) in 688 post(s)
Volturno wrote:
leather-girl wrote:
Coops wrote:
New Order a New Order tribute act, apparently

Without a trace of irony, too.

Blah blah blah.....no matter what he says, New Order are New Order.

One has to be irrationally anti-Hooky to say so. Even Barney knows they can't be New Order, they can't write music with the same quality without Hooky.

Barney, Steve and co. are cashing out to retire and never think about playing live ever again. Not that they're wrong, though, they're all nearing their 60s.
Hooky is trying to do the same thing, but he seems to have managed his money way worse than Barney has, judging by the latter's yacht and SLK. Hence Hooky working his ass off, which is something I'll always admire in a person. Hooky, legally an ex-member of New Order, has a smaller cut than the rest in NewOrderNow, which is what he's fighting in court for. I don't see him winning anytime soon, and I bet that will drain most of the money he's making right now.
They will all remain bitter enemies until they're older, the new record is out and the court fight has been resolved. Then, Barney (and maybe Steve too) will write his own memories of both JD and NO in addition to Hooky's, and that's the only thing I can look forward to.

Why are you so sure about that? Hooky left- the others didn't fire him. Everybody in music 'works' their 'ass' off, whether they are New Order, or Hooky doing whatever he does. I highly doubt Hooky will be poor because of the current New Order. If there are past royalties issues, then have them solve that in private. I'm not saying Bernard's perfect, but these interviews are not really helping him. You must know Bernard well if you can assume even Bernard 'knows' they can't be New Order (sarcastic).
thanks 2 users thanked Eimi for this useful post.
bloodynora on 01/02/2013(UTC), ROCKET MICK on 01/02/2013(UTC)
Stoo  
#7 Posted : 01 February 2013 00:20:05(UTC)
Stoo

Rank: Young Offender

Groups: Registered
Joined: 03/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 33

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 45 time(s) in 33 post(s)
How many times does he have to say stuff like this?

The bass player left the band and they suddenly become a tribute band without him? The man's arrogance know's no boundaries. They didn’t reform behind his back and they never broke up anyway. Hooky left so surely they can do what they damn well want.

Having seen them live over the past year I can safely say they manage perfectly fine without him. I'm getting increasingly bored of his gobbing off to any paper or blog that will give him the time of day. I wish he would get over it and just move on.






thanks 3 users thanked Stoo for this useful post.
bloodynora on 01/02/2013(UTC), Eimi on 01/02/2013(UTC), ROCKET MICK on 01/02/2013(UTC)
El Jarvo  
#8 Posted : 01 February 2013 02:21:36(UTC)
El Jarvo

Rank: Member of the Brotherhood

Groups: Registered
Joined: 01/05/2012(UTC)
Posts: 313
Location: No.18

Thanks: 4 times
Was thanked: 443 time(s) in 313 post(s)
leather-girl wrote:
Coops wrote:
New Order a New Order tribute act, apparently

Without a trace of irony, too.

Blah blah blah.....no matter what he says, New Order are New Order.


They're not though, are they?

They might still be a New Order but they're definitely not 'the' New Order.

thanks 1 user thanked El Jarvo for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 01/02/2013(UTC)
Eimi  
#9 Posted : 01 February 2013 03:32:36(UTC)
Eimi

Rank: Member of the Movement

Groups: Registered
Joined: 29/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 688
Woman
Location: Japan

Thanks: 528 times
Was thanked: 875 time(s) in 688 post(s)
El Jarvo wrote:
leather-girl wrote:
Coops wrote:
New Order a New Order tribute act, apparently

Without a trace of irony, too.

Blah blah blah.....no matter what he says, New Order are New Order.


They're not though, are they?

They might still be a New Order but they're definitely not 'the' New Order.


But they're clearly not a tribute band, though. Funny that I've never heard him in interviews claiming that New Order without Gillian were a tribute band even though the lineup was slightly different then.
thanks 2 users thanked Eimi for this useful post.
Stoo on 01/02/2013(UTC), ROCKET MICK on 01/02/2013(UTC)
Aracri  
#10 Posted : 01 February 2013 03:41:51(UTC)
Aracri

Rank: Member of the Brotherhood

Groups: Registered
Joined: 26/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 346
Man
Location: Rio de Janeiro

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 403 time(s) in 355 post(s)
Some groups change their lineups, it's simple and quite common. And that doesn't make them tribute bands. Hooky continues his bizarre comparisons... No

I really think Tom Chapman's doing a good job in New Order, but it's obvious it would be much better if Hooky's still was with them. Now New Order has a new line up and that is it.

Edited by user 01 February 2013 03:43:06(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

Peter Who?

UserPostedImage

thanks 2 users thanked Aracri for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 01/02/2013(UTC), Pyrtwist on 01/02/2013(UTC)
CTB  
#11 Posted : 01 February 2013 05:12:38(UTC)
CTB

Rank: Member of the Village

Groups: Registered
Joined: 29/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 56
Location: Australia

Thanks: 15 times
Was thanked: 105 time(s) in 57 post(s)
Volturno wrote:
leather-girl wrote:
Coops wrote:
New Order a New Order tribute act, apparently

Without a trace of irony, too.

Blah blah blah.....no matter what he says, New Order are New Order.

One has to be irrationally anti-Hooky to say so. Even Barney knows they can't be New Order, they can't write music with the same quality without Hooky.

Barney, Steve and co. are cashing out to retire and never think about playing live ever again. Not that they're wrong, though, they're all nearing their 60s.
Hooky is trying to do the same thing, but he seems to have managed his money way worse than Barney has, judging by the latter's yacht and SLK. Hence Hooky working his ass off, which is something I'll always admire in a person. Hooky, legally an ex-member of New Order, has a smaller cut than the rest in NewOrderNow, which is what he's fighting in court for. I don't see him winning anytime soon, and I bet that will drain most of the money he's making right now.
They will all remain bitter enemies until they're older, the new record is out and the court fight has been resolved. Then, Barney (and maybe Steve too) will write his own memories of both JD and NO in addition to Hooky's, and that's the only thing I can look forward to.


What a ridiculously sycophantic perspective - amongst a whole lot of unsubstantiated hearsay, you allege New Order of cashing in by touring, and then commend and admire Hooky for doing the same thing?

Is it really 'irrationally anti-Hooky' to point out that the band he left are, in fact, still going? Looks like the irrationality is on your side of things....

Don't forget...
thanks 4 users thanked CTB for this useful post.
Baggie Boiler on 01/02/2013(UTC), tarbox23 on 01/02/2013(UTC), ROCKET MICK on 01/02/2013(UTC), Rorschach on 01/02/2013(UTC)
tarbox23  
#12 Posted : 01 February 2013 05:54:41(UTC)
tarbox23

Rank: Member of the Republic

Groups: Registered
Joined: 24/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 119
Man
Location: mystic, ct

Thanks: 58 times
Was thanked: 156 time(s) in 120 post(s)
CTB wrote:


HAH! That is really all that needs to be said. PERFECT.
Boston MA 86 | Great Woods MA 87-89-93 | Lake Compounce CT 89 | Meadowlands NJ 89 | NYC 05 + 12
thanks 3 users thanked tarbox23 for this useful post.
CTB on 01/02/2013(UTC), ersatz01 on 01/02/2013(UTC), ROCKET MICK on 01/02/2013(UTC)
ZASmusic  
#13 Posted : 01 February 2013 08:55:55(UTC)
ZASmusic

Rank: Member of the Republic

Groups: Registered
Joined: 16/01/2013(UTC)
Posts: 133
Location: New York City

Thanks: 7 times
Was thanked: 201 time(s) in 134 post(s)
It is indeed a rare thing to see Hooky speak with such passion! The mystery unravels!
thanks 1 user thanked ZASmusic for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 01/02/2013(UTC)
www.neworderweb.net  
#14 Posted : 01 February 2013 09:01:57(UTC)
www.neworderweb.net

Rank: Member of the Village

Groups: Registered
Joined: 29/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 67
Location: Barnsley,South Yorkshire ,UK

Thanks: 23 times
Was thanked: 82 time(s) in 68 post(s)
Volturno wrote:
leather-girl wrote:
Coops wrote:
New Order a New Order tribute act, apparently

Without a trace of irony, too.

Blah blah blah.....no matter what he says, New Order are New Order.

One has to be irrationally anti-Hooky to say so. Hooky, legally an ex-member of New Order, has a smaller cut than the rest in NewOrderNow, which is what he's fighting in court for. I don't see him winning anytime soon, and I bet that will drain most of the money he's making right now.
They will all remain bitter enemies until they're older, the new record is out and the court fight has been resolved.


Always wondered why people find they feel it neccessary to comment on something they havent got a f**king clue about.

Roll Eyes
thanks 2 users thanked www.neworderweb.net for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 01/02/2013(UTC), Eimi on 01/02/2013(UTC)
Aracri  
#15 Posted : 01 February 2013 12:08:12(UTC)
Aracri

Rank: Member of the Brotherhood

Groups: Registered
Joined: 26/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 346
Man
Location: Rio de Janeiro

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 403 time(s) in 355 post(s)
tarbox23 wrote:
CTB wrote:


LoL

Edited by user 01 February 2013 12:10:20(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

Peter Who?

UserPostedImage

thanks 1 user thanked Aracri for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 01/02/2013(UTC)
Volturno  
#16 Posted : 01 February 2013 12:50:55(UTC)
Volturno

Rank: Member of the Village

Groups: Registered
Joined: 29/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 86
Location: Rio de Janeiro

Thanks: 17 times
Was thanked: 97 time(s) in 87 post(s)
leather-girl wrote:
Volturno wrote:
leather-girl wrote:
Coops wrote:
New Order a New Order tribute act, apparently

Without a trace of irony, too.

Blah blah blah.....no matter what he says, New Order are New Order.

One has to be irrationally anti-Hooky to say so. Even Barney knows they can't be New Order, they can't write music with the same quality without Hooky.

Barney, Steve and co. are cashing out to retire and never think about playing live ever again. Not that they're wrong, though, they're all nearing their 60s.
Hooky is trying to do the same thing, but he seems to have managed his money way worse than Barney has, judging by the latter's yacht and SLK. Hence Hooky working his ass off, which is something I'll always admire in a person. Hooky, legally an ex-member of New Order, has a smaller cut than the rest in NewOrderNow, which is what he's fighting in court for. I don't see him winning anytime soon, and I bet that will drain most of the money he's making right now.
They will all remain bitter enemies until they're older, the new record is out and the court fight has been resolved. Then, Barney (and maybe Steve too) will write his own memories of both JD and NO in addition to Hooky's, and that's the only thing I can look forward to.

Why are you so sure about that? Hooky left- the others didn't fire him. Everybody in music 'works' their 'ass' off, whether they are New Order, or Hooky doing whatever he does. I highly doubt Hooky will be poor because of the current New Order. If there are past royalties issues, then have them solve that in private. I'm not saying Bernard's perfect, but these interviews are not really helping him. You must know Bernard well if you can assume even Bernard 'knows' they can't be New Order (sarcastic).

It's clear he left, I don't disagree. I never said NewOrder aren't working their ass off, they surely are, it's just that Hooky is bashed for doing so, and I think that's unfair. At least he's doing something that hasn't been done before with JD/NO records. Barney and co. are basically playing "Singles" live, which I'm a bit tired of, but they're doing what they think is right, and I admire them just as well.
Also, I don't have to know Bernard, it's common sense. Whether Hooky is arrogant or not that's another matter, but it's obvious that he was a vital part of New Order's sound. They can't (and won't try to) imitate it.

CTB wrote:


What a ridiculously sycophantic perspective - amongst a whole lot of unsubstantiated hearsay, you allege New Order of cashing in by touring, and then commend and admire Hooky for doing the same thing?

Is it really 'irrationally anti-Hooky' to point out that the band he left are, in fact, still going? Looks like the irrationality is on your side of things....

Don't forget...

I was not criticizing New Order for making money with their own work, perhaps "cashing out" was a poor choice of words. I just meant that they're getting old and they're cashing out (like in a casino) while they still can.
thanks 1 user thanked Volturno for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 01/02/2013(UTC)
Andy  
#17 Posted : 01 February 2013 18:04:44(UTC)
Andy

Rank: Dead Soul

Groups: Registered
Joined: 24/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 2,123
Man
Location: Seaside, California

Thanks: 1431 times
Was thanked: 3069 time(s) in 2142 post(s)
Volturno says "Barney and co. are basically playing "Singles" live".

While the majority of concert-goers (not the discerning fans that populate this board) would probably be satisfied with that, it's not strictly true. Shadowplay, Isolation, Age of Consent, 586, Your Silent Face, Love Vigilantes, Elegia and Close Range don't fit that bill. A few of the singles they played (Thieves Like Us, Round & Round & 1963) hadn't been performed in decades. Additionally, Here to Stay had never been performed live.

The Light have certainly been working hard, but to suggest that New Order are just phoning it in is inaccurate.
thanks 3 users thanked Andy for this useful post.
Eimi on 01/02/2013(UTC), Pyrtwist on 01/02/2013(UTC), ROCKET MICK on 03/02/2013(UTC)
Volturno  
#18 Posted : 01 February 2013 20:30:37(UTC)
Volturno

Rank: Member of the Village

Groups: Registered
Joined: 29/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 86
Location: Rio de Janeiro

Thanks: 17 times
Was thanked: 97 time(s) in 87 post(s)
Andy wrote:
Volturno says "Barney and co. are basically playing "Singles" live".

While the majority of concert-goers (not the discerning fans that populate this board) would probably be satisfied with that, it's not strictly true. Shadowplay, Isolation, Age of Consent, 586, Your Silent Face, Love Vigilantes, Elegia and Close Range don't fit that bill. A few of the singles they played (Thieves Like Us, Round & Round & 1963) hadn't been performed in decades. Additionally, Here to Stay had never been performed live.

The Light have certainly been working hard, but to suggest that New Order are just phoning it in is inaccurate.

Shadowplay and Isolation are big JD songs; Age of Consent is even more popular; 586 and Your Silent Face are welcome additions, I really like NewOrderNow playing them; Elegia is nice, but I don't like it being played in festivals and such; Close Range sounds terrible judging by the videos, Tom Chapman couldn't even play the proper lines. Here To Stay was a big surprise, very good.

You're right, though, they are trying, maybe it's the bad taste that the São Paulo gig left in my mouth. Still, I'd pay just to see them not play BLT and Blue Monday.
thanks 1 user thanked Volturno for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 03/02/2013(UTC)
0_o  
#19 Posted : 02 February 2013 01:37:12(UTC)
0_o

Rank: Member of the Village

Groups: Registered
Joined: 09/06/2012(UTC)
Posts: 80

Thanks: 13 times
Was thanked: 92 time(s) in 80 post(s)
Without doubt, Hooky's is basically a JD tribute band, pretty absurd to suggest otherwise. Didn't he even call it a celebration of Joy Division? And of course making money is a big part of it, thou I'm sure he has had some fun and likes the attention.

New Order currently... well, it's not the same, they are different and older. Saying they are a tribute band is rather harsh, Hooky is bitter obviously. Of course money is a big part also whatever they might say, and the attention of bigger crowds than Bad Loo.
Currently, "new" New Order plays old songs for a crowd that expects to hear old songs. Competently, but rather blandly, with little to challenge the audience. More like a traditional big label rock band, not much spontaneity. I don't think that is Bernard's strength, being the cliched traditional front man, especially at this stage of his career. On the plus side, at least they have offered a little variety in the playlist, showing some respect for their back catalogue, and did revamp 586 nicely. I assume some of this is from advice from outside the band. They have not even bothered to learn any Lost Sirens songs. If "new" New Order is plugged in creatively for real, they should show it soon... they have been doing the reunion tour with "pleasing the crowd with oldies show" for over a year, and will continue that with the upcoming festivals this summer. Sorry, but they are mostly a "dinosaur" group at this point, playing oldies, taking the path of least resistance. Enjoy the shows and have a good time, but it is what it is.

Now if you look back to 2005-6 when Hooky was still in the band, they were awfully boring in my opinion, playing the same songs in standard fashion with much of the show using obviously prepared backing tapes (quite lame). Much of a tribute dinosaur band at that point anyway, not like there has been a big dropoff in quality. Of course, there is no Hooky to share the spotlight now or offer an opinion... Bernard is obviously very happy about that.

If you like, have fun at the shows, nothing wrong with that, do it while you are able. This is the end stage of their careers. If Bernard, Steve, Gillian create anything new that is good, it's a bonus. Probably won't be essential but maybe they have a few surprises left, who knows. I doubt Hooky will try anything new after the debacle of Freebass.
Smile

Edited by user 02 February 2013 08:59:42(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

thanks 1 user thanked 0_o for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 03/02/2013(UTC)
Stoo  
#20 Posted : 02 February 2013 02:06:08(UTC)
Stoo

Rank: Young Offender

Groups: Registered
Joined: 03/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 33

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 45 time(s) in 33 post(s)
It's just another day,
In a life,
Of a superstar........

Wink





thanks 2 users thanked Stoo for this useful post.
Mike C. on 02/02/2013(UTC), ROCKET MICK on 03/02/2013(UTC)
Mike C.  
#21 Posted : 02 February 2013 05:32:47(UTC)
Mike C.

Rank: Member of the Republic

Groups: Registered
Joined: 03/06/2012(UTC)
Posts: 129
Man
Location: Atlanta, GA USA

Thanks: 213 times
Was thanked: 152 time(s) in 129 post(s)
Stoo wrote:
It's just another day,
In a life,
Of a superstar........

Wink







No matter who you are.
...in a single breath, this world is gone...
thanks 3 users thanked Mike C. for this useful post.
Eimi on 02/02/2013(UTC), Stoo on 02/02/2013(UTC), ROCKET MICK on 03/02/2013(UTC)
Nick King  
#22 Posted : 02 February 2013 13:40:35(UTC)
Nick King

Rank: Member of the Village

Groups: Registered
Joined: 24/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 79
Man
Location: Welwyn Garden City

Thanks: 50 times
Was thanked: 122 time(s) in 83 post(s)
Volturno wrote:
Still, I'd pay just to see them not play BLT and Blue Monday.


They didn't play Blue Monday in 2001 (Glasgow), although I wasn't there. Apparently, the crowd were a bit miffed that they didn't on that occasion! Tongue

Cool
thanks 1 user thanked Nick King for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 03/02/2013(UTC)
NotAMod  
#23 Posted : 02 February 2013 15:13:54(UTC)
NotAMod

Rank: Moderator

Groups: Moderators, Administrators, Registered
Joined: 24/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 651
Location: London, UK

Thanks: 175 times
Was thanked: 1035 time(s) in 653 post(s)
Volturno wrote:
Close Range sounds terrible judging by the videos, Tom Chapman couldn't even play the proper lines.


Er how often did they actually play Close Range last year? The way you go on about it it's like Chapman was murdering it on a regular basis so he's a crap bassist but as far as I know they played twice in grand total. More fool them for trying to add an old album track back into the set I guess, the main thing they get criticised for not doing on here. Obviously it was a bit under rehearsed but it's hardly an accurate barometer of how good Chapman is at replicating the bass lines. There is a bit of a broad consensus (not bias) that he's doing them justice.

It's the same as The Light having received plaudits for replicating the Joy Division/early New Order sound well, which they do.

Bias cuts both ways really...

Edited by user 02 February 2013 15:14:52(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

thanks 2 users thanked NotAMod for this useful post.
Nick King on 02/02/2013(UTC), ROCKET MICK on 03/02/2013(UTC)
Volturno  
#24 Posted : 02 February 2013 22:25:19(UTC)
Volturno

Rank: Member of the Village

Groups: Registered
Joined: 29/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 86
Location: Rio de Janeiro

Thanks: 17 times
Was thanked: 97 time(s) in 87 post(s)
NotAMod wrote:
Volturno wrote:
Close Range sounds terrible judging by the videos, Tom Chapman couldn't even play the proper lines.


Er how often did they actually play Close Range last year? The way you go on about it it's like Chapman was murdering it on a regular basis so he's a crap bassist but as far as I know they played twice in grand total. More fool them for trying to add an old album track back into the set I guess, the main thing they get criticised for not doing on here. Obviously it was a bit under rehearsed but it's hardly an accurate barometer of how good Chapman is at replicating the bass lines. There is a bit of a broad consensus (not bias) that he's doing them justice.

It's the same as The Light having received plaudits for replicating the Joy Division/early New Order sound well, which they do.

Bias cuts both ways really...

I simply mentioned it. They played it twice, you're right, but I've never said that a terrible performance makes him a crap bassist. He did play it very very poorly, but it doesn't mean he can't do it properly.
By the way, it's not foolish to play old album tracks, it's foolish to play them "under-rehearsed", which is more of an understatement IMO.

You can see there's even a bass track playing in the background, mostly during the lower register bits.
thanks 1 user thanked Volturno for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 03/02/2013(UTC)
Andy  
#25 Posted : 02 February 2013 23:16:14(UTC)
Andy

Rank: Dead Soul

Groups: Registered
Joined: 24/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 2,123
Man
Location: Seaside, California

Thanks: 1431 times
Was thanked: 3069 time(s) in 2142 post(s)
I remember the good old days when New Order never hit a bum note. Virtuosity was the order of the day. Sobriety and clinical precision is surey lacking in this, the vilest of New Odours!
thanks 2 users thanked Andy for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 03/02/2013(UTC), NotAMod on 03/02/2013(UTC)
Users browsing this topic
Guest
4 Pages123>»
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF 2.1.1 | YAF © 2003-2024, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 1.821 seconds.