logo
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

3 Pages123>
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Linus Solanki  
#1 Posted : 17 January 2013 04:59:41(UTC)
Linus Solanki

Rank: Member of the Movement

Groups: Registered
Joined: 10/05/2012(UTC)
Posts: 623
Location: NYC

Thanks: 57 times
Was thanked: 1013 time(s) in 643 post(s)
http://www.virginmedia.c...at-now-for-new-order.php

Thirty three years into their career, have New Order reached an impasse? What will probably be their last album with bassist Peter Hook is an extended EP of rarities – stuff they've already recorded and reworked. Will there ever be anything new from the band who brought us hits like Blue Monday and True Faith. Luke Turner examines if and why we still need them.

...Are they still relevant?
It sometimes feels that there are so many heritage groups going that new bands must struggle to get a way in. And it's fair to say that those who just wearily trawl around the lucrative gig circuit without writing any new material ought to be sent out to pasture - here's looking at you, Pixies.

But now Peter Hook has quit New Order - and has wasted no time in putting across his side of the story - the rest of the band have things to prove: That they're not spent as a creative force, and can carry on without him. Hopefully this will give them the creative impetus they need to go on and write more great New Order material that'll hopefully continue to evolve their sound.

New Order's story is a long, tortuous and, at times painful one. As everyone knows, they formed after the suicide of Ian Curtis put an end to Joy Division - at first, it wasn't even that clear that Bernard Sumner would end up as their singer. For the last thirty years, New Order's career has been a very British mess of making do, including bankruptcy and the occasional blizzard of acrimony and dubious financial decisions. The Blue Monday sleeve that lost the band a fortune merely the most famous anecdote, followed by the painful collapse of Factory Records. It'd be a shame if they were now to end with a bitter split and one mini LP (good though it is) of outtakes.

The love for New Order stretches across music boundaries

The first time I saw New Order was in Finsbury Park in 2002 when I was a skinny, feckless youth. It had been raining all day, and the park was a mud bath. Yet when New Order came onstage, the skies suddenly cleared, Concord flew overhead en-route to Heathrow, and when the band played Joy Division songs for the first time in years, the vibes in the crowd went up to 11.

Halfway through Bizarre Love Triangle, my leg felt strangely warm… I turned round and realised 19 stone of skinhead lunatic was urinating on my leg. Even that couldn't ruin what was an amazing gig. The New Order crowd is a really diverse one - there are the now-affluent middle class males who were into them back in the day, the 80s rave casualties, loutish indie kids, techno heads, pop fans - New Order have something for everyone.

No Hooky, but what about Gillian?

For many years, New Order were without their fourth member, synth player Gillian Gilbert. Funnily enough, back then you didn't find people screaming "It's not New Order without Gillian" as they do now about Peter Hook leaving the band, and the rest carrying on under the New Order name. This seems to be a rather unpleasant case of rockist sexism - we can't do without the big lumbering bloke playing a bass guitar down by his knees, but the woman delivering the killer-synth lines isn't important.

The underrated powerhouse of New Order is man machine Stephen Morris - he's the one who had the geeky fascination with electronics and drum machines. Morris and Gilbert (who are partners and live on a farm outside Macclesfield) have previously recorded albums under the name The Other Two (a pointed dig at those who thought them anonymous compared to Hook and Sumner). The absence of Hook, and presence of Gillian working with Morris and Sumner, is going to be interesting as New Order continue.

Why we need New Order today

There aren't many groups who've managed to combine art (see the bonkers video for True Faith) and pop (the only decent World Cup song ever) quite like New Order. For whatever reason, at the moment there seems to be a view that art and pop are chalk and well, cheese. Electronic pop at the moment relies on steroid beats sourced from the sort of music that used to make us cringe on holiday visits to European clubs, and the curse of processed, Auto-tune vocals shows no sign of going away.

There's also been a separation between club music and what gets on the radio - gone are the days when a record could get played in sweaty basements, before making their way to the top of the charts. Could a rejuvenated New Order come up with new material that's as smart and accessible as their 80s heyday bring some intelligence, wit and genuine dancefloor energy back to mainstream British music?

Do you think New Order can continue without Peter Hook? Is it time the band called it a day? Let us know on Twitter @MusicOnVM.
.
I promise to make you so alive that the fall of dust on furniture will deafen you. Nina Cassian
thanks 2 users thanked Linus Solanki for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 17/01/2013(UTC), jed the shed on 17/01/2013(UTC)
Sponsor
jed the shed  
#2 Posted : 17 January 2013 05:19:39(UTC)
jed the shed

Rank: Member of the Village

Groups: Registered
Joined: 24/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 83
Location: Preston

Thanks: 37 times
Was thanked: 101 time(s) in 83 post(s)
If you want your New Order sound, but still want the Peter Hook sound you could always try Exchange
Wink
thanks 1 user thanked jed the shed for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 17/01/2013(UTC)
Coops  
#3 Posted : 17 January 2013 05:36:55(UTC)
Coops

Rank: Member of the Brotherhood

Groups: Registered
Joined: 25/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 448
Location: Xiberia

Thanks: 34 times
Was thanked: 611 time(s) in 456 post(s)
wrote:
Why we need New Order today

There aren't many groups who've managed to combine art (see the bonkers video for True Faith) and pop (the only decent World Cup song ever) quite like New Order. For whatever reason, at the moment there seems to be a view that art and pop are chalk and well, cheese. Electronic pop at the moment relies on steroid beats sourced from the sort of music that used to make us cringe on holiday visits to European clubs, and the curse of processed, Auto-tune vocals shows no sign of going away.

There's also been a separation between club music and what gets on the radio - gone are the days when a record could get played in sweaty basements, before making their way to the top of the charts. Could a rejuvenated New Order come up with new material that's as smart and accessible as their 80s heyday bring some intelligence, wit and genuine dancefloor energy back to mainstream British music?

Not sure a bunch of nearly pensioners are the ones likely to do all that for you m'afraid. Besides they've done all that once. Not their fault if it all got fucked again.

Keep the links coming though, Linus.
thanks 1 user thanked Coops for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 17/01/2013(UTC)
ZASmusic  
#4 Posted : 18 January 2013 07:53:27(UTC)
ZASmusic

Rank: Member of the Republic

Groups: Registered
Joined: 16/01/2013(UTC)
Posts: 133
Location: New York City

Thanks: 7 times
Was thanked: 201 time(s) in 134 post(s)
Linus Solanki wrote:
http://www.virginmedia.com/music/features/what-now-for-new-order.php


No Hooky, but what about Gillian?

For many years, New Order were without their fourth member, synth player Gillian Gilbert. Funnily enough, back then you didn't find people screaming "It's not New Order without Gillian" as they do now about Peter Hook leaving the band, and the rest carrying on under the New Order name. This seems to be a rather unpleasant case of rockist sexism - we can't do without the big lumbering bloke playing a bass guitar down by his knees, but the woman delivering the killer-synth lines isn't important.

.


Nice to see a journalist finally mentioning this. Gillian's keyboards are as essential to New Order's sound as Hooky's bass. I for one was never taken in by the lumbering bass lad onstage...what drew me to New Order was Sumner's voice, Gillian's Synth melodies, and Steve's drumming.


Zachery Allan Starkey
thanks 3 users thanked ZASmusic for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 18/01/2013(UTC), Cranelane on 18/01/2013(UTC), Eimi on 18/01/2013(UTC)
Michael Monkhouse  
#5 Posted : 18 January 2013 08:01:55(UTC)
Michael Monkhouse

Rank: Guilty Partner

Groups: Registered
Joined: 03/06/2012(UTC)
Posts: 1,998
Location: Rome

Thanks: 61 times
Was thanked: 2410 time(s) in 2004 post(s)
ZASmusic wrote:
Linus Solanki wrote:
http://www.virginmedia.com/music/features/what-now-for-new-order.php


No Hooky, but what about Gillian?

For many years, New Order were without their fourth member, synth player Gillian Gilbert. Funnily enough, back then you didn't find people screaming "It's not New Order without Gillian" as they do now about Peter Hook leaving the band, and the rest carrying on under the New Order name. This seems to be a rather unpleasant case of rockist sexism - we can't do without the big lumbering bloke playing a bass guitar down by his knees, but the woman delivering the killer-synth lines isn't important.

.


Nice to see a journalist finally mentioning this. Gillian's keyboards are as essential to New Order's sound as Hooky's bass. I for one was never taken in by the lumbering bass lad onstage...what drew me to New Order was Sumner's voice, Gillian's Synth melodies, and Steve's drumming.


This is an interesting point, I can only imagine it's because Hook is considered a more distinctive instrumentalist / performer...? I'm not saying he is of course, I'm just wondering why yes, there is this discrepancy in people's reactions. I don't think it's a question of sexism, is it?
To be honest while I've become a Hooky fan I never used to like his look-at-me stance either, I just found it intrusive to the group dynamic and strangely inappropriate to the actual music. I remember when Regret made TOTP at uni, a friend said 'I saw that band you're always going on about - nice song but what's wrong with the guy with the bass?' For many it was a high point of the shows though!

Edited by user 18 January 2013 08:08:28(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

thanks 1 user thanked Michael Monkhouse for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 18/01/2013(UTC)
ZASmusic  
#6 Posted : 18 January 2013 08:12:06(UTC)
ZASmusic

Rank: Member of the Republic

Groups: Registered
Joined: 16/01/2013(UTC)
Posts: 133
Location: New York City

Thanks: 7 times
Was thanked: 201 time(s) in 134 post(s)
Michael Monkhouse wrote:
ZASmusic wrote:
Linus Solanki wrote:
http://www.virginmedia.com/music/features/what-now-for-new-order.php


No Hooky, but what about Gillian?

For many years, New Order were without their fourth member, synth player Gillian Gilbert. Funnily enough, back then you didn't find people screaming "It's not New Order without Gillian" as they do now about Peter Hook leaving the band, and the rest carrying on under the New Order name. This seems to be a rather unpleasant case of rockist sexism - we can't do without the big lumbering bloke playing a bass guitar down by his knees, but the woman delivering the killer-synth lines isn't important.

.


Nice to see a journalist finally mentioning this. Gillian's keyboards are as essential to New Order's sound as Hooky's bass. I for one was never taken in by the lumbering bass lad onstage...what drew me to New Order was Sumner's voice, Gillian's Synth melodies, and Steve's drumming.


Zachery Allan Starkey


This is an interesting point, I can only imagine it's because Hook is considered a more distinctive instrumentalist / performer...? I'm not saying he is of course, I'm just wondering why yes, there is this discrepancy in people's reactions. I don't think it's a question of sexism, is it?


It is evident...in footage from New Order's various festival appearances from 2012, Gillian gets by far the least amount of screen time. One example...during the synth solo in 586, they will often show Phil or Barney riffing on their guitars...even though Gillian is standing under a spotlight playing a fairly tough keyboard solo.

In the world of rock music, female musicians are often taken less seriously than male musicians, and that is a form of sexism. Hooky's stage presence and onstage mugging was great, but they weren't the main thing in New Order that I identified with. His bass lines, of course, were essential...as is what Steve, Bernard, and Gillian bring to the band.

Zachery Allan Starkey

Edited by user 18 January 2013 08:13:50(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

thanks 1 user thanked ZASmusic for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 18/01/2013(UTC)
Cranelane  
#7 Posted : 18 January 2013 13:02:44(UTC)
Cranelane

Rank: Member of the Brotherhood

Groups: Registered
Joined: 24/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 378
Location: Cork

Thanks: 144 times
Was thanked: 511 time(s) in 388 post(s)
ZASmusic wrote:
Linus Solanki wrote:
http://www.virginmedia.com/music/features/what-now-for-new-order.php


No Hooky, but what about Gillian?

For many years, New Order were without their fourth member, synth player Gillian Gilbert. Funnily enough, back then you didn't find people screaming "It's not New Order without Gillian" as they do now about Peter Hook leaving the band, and the rest carrying on under the New Order name. This seems to be a rather unpleasant case of rockist sexism - we can't do without the big lumbering bloke playing a bass guitar down by his knees, but the woman delivering the killer-synth lines isn't important.

.


Nice to see a journalist finally mentioning this. Gillian's keyboards are as essential to New Order's sound as Hooky's bass. I for one was never taken in by the lumbering bass lad onstage...what drew me to New Order was Sumner's voice, Gillian's Synth melodies, and Steve's drumming.


Zachery Allan Starkey


Hooky is responsible for the bass guitar in New Order, so we can hear his contribution in every song on which he plays and note his absence and its effect on the songs where he has been left out of the mix, but as for the synths, who can tell whether any particular synth melody that you care to mention was actually created by Gillian or by Bernard as they both play keyboards?

Edited by user 18 January 2013 13:04:42(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

thanks 1 user thanked Cranelane for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 18/01/2013(UTC)
0_o  
#8 Posted : 19 January 2013 00:13:09(UTC)
0_o

Rank: Member of the Village

Groups: Registered
Joined: 09/06/2012(UTC)
Posts: 80

Thanks: 13 times
Was thanked: 92 time(s) in 80 post(s)
That may be true that Gillian has been unfairly perceived, or maybe some make too many assumptions. How do fans know how much she added, or didn't add? How much did she write? Did she actually play everything in the studio? Do we really know? What can one assume?
In Gillian's favor, if you compare 80s New Order to Bernard's work with Electronic, to my ears Electronic doesn't sound nearly as unique. Doesn't sound like New Order.
Gillian quite frankly showed little public personality or opinions, acted like a wallflower on stage, which is a factor. Gillian retired and one presumes she wanted New Order to go on, which is another factor.

Hooky was one of the three members from Joy Division, so he is more famous. He has been more of a public figure. He had a live stage presence. His leaving the band was obviously rather acrimonious... Hooky did not want New Order to continue, a different situation from Gillian.

I do think that many fans think of New Order as different from one of those bands which have many band members leaving and joining every few years around one dominant leader, like The Fall or The Cure. I like to think that New Order was an ensemble joint effort, not a backing band for Bernard.

Bernard and Peter have made much better music together than they did seperate, and they are well over the creative hill after 30 years in the business. The Lost Sirens were recorded like 9 years ago. My expectations for new New Order circa 2014 are very low. Maybe to be positive, Gillian and Steve will get inspired and a new record will not be just a bland middle of the road rock record like Never Cry Another Tear. Not that Hooky did better, the Freebass album should have never been more than a rumour.

Edited by user 19 January 2013 00:24:23(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

thanks 1 user thanked 0_o for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 19/01/2013(UTC)
JoanneB  
#9 Posted : 19 January 2013 00:49:57(UTC)
JoanneB

Rank: Candidate

Groups: Registered
Joined: 18/01/2013(UTC)
Posts: 8

Thanks: 2 times
Was thanked: 11 time(s) in 8 post(s)
Some interesting points put forward. I hope its not the end of the band, having been a fan for 25 years. I think all the members are equally important. I have only been lucky enough to catch them live twice. First at the Troxy in Dec 2011 and then Hyde Park at the Olympics last year. Was really great but not the same without Hooky. Didn't like it when Gillian left either - glad she's back. Have enjoyed Lost Sirens but it would be nice to hear some new material.
thanks 2 users thanked JoanneB for this useful post.
Eimi on 19/01/2013(UTC), ROCKET MICK on 19/01/2013(UTC)
markreed  
#10 Posted : 19 January 2013 03:09:55(UTC)
markreed

Rank: Member of the Republic

Groups: Registered
Joined: 02/05/2012(UTC)
Posts: 229
Location: Somewhere, GB

Thanks: 3 times
Was thanked: 353 time(s) in 229 post(s)
About time someone spoke up for Gillian. Does anyone think that N.O. would've have been as interesting without her synth & guitar flourishes? To try and pre-emptively justify Hooky's "It's not New Order without me but it was without her", he's been belittling her contribution. Shame. I can't see why there won't be new New Order material (Bernard has put out a record every three or so years fairly consistently for the past 20 or so years), but they really do need to move beyond the "two years in a studio costing £500k" bullshit as it will bankrupt them : and the BL LP cost £30k, and sounded just fine.
thanks 2 users thanked markreed for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 19/01/2013(UTC), Eimi on 19/01/2013(UTC)
Debaser  
#11 Posted : 19 January 2013 03:23:09(UTC)
Debaser

Rank: Dead Soul

Groups: Registered
Joined: 03/06/2012(UTC)
Posts: 2,054
Location: here n there

Thanks: 486 times
Was thanked: 3010 time(s) in 2075 post(s)
0_o wrote:
Maybe to be positive, Gillian and Steve will get inspired.


Not sure many people agree with me but I really liked 'Swing' which is the most recent new music that Gillian & Steve released. Bernard has talked about going electronic, so I'd love it if they picked up from Swing and did something similar. It might not be accessible to the masses but it would be interesting. It might also negate the problem of: what kind of bass is on the record. Answer: electronic bass.

As well as G&S (especially Steve) being involved with Factory Floor, I've noticed that Gllian has become quite friendly with Skrillex in recent times. If we hear any insane dubstep on the new stuff, we can assume that's Gillian!
The track below is kinda fun. Great lyrics...


thanks 1 user thanked Debaser for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 19/01/2013(UTC)
Eimi  
#12 Posted : 19 January 2013 03:49:40(UTC)
Eimi

Rank: Member of the Movement

Groups: Registered
Joined: 29/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 688
Woman
Location: Japan

Thanks: 528 times
Was thanked: 875 time(s) in 688 post(s)
Debaser wrote:
0_o wrote:
Maybe to be positive, Gillian and Steve will get inspired.


Not sure many people agree with me but I really liked 'Swing' which is the most recent new music that Gillian & Steve released. Bernard has talked about going electronic, so I'd love it if they picked up from Swing and did something similar. It might not be accessible to the masses but it would be interesting. It might also negate the problem of: what kind of bass is on the record. Answer: electronic bass.

As well as G&S (especially Steve) being involved with Factory Floor, I've noticed that Gllian has become quite friendly with Skrillex in recent times. If we hear any insane dubstep on the new stuff, we can assume that's Gillian!
The track below is kinda fun. Great lyrics...



Dead Dubstep? No way.... New Order would've sold themselves out too much if they actually try to make crap like dubstep. No No
thanks 1 user thanked Eimi for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 19/01/2013(UTC)
Eimi  
#13 Posted : 19 January 2013 03:52:42(UTC)
Eimi

Rank: Member of the Movement

Groups: Registered
Joined: 29/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 688
Woman
Location: Japan

Thanks: 528 times
Was thanked: 875 time(s) in 688 post(s)
markreed wrote:
About time someone spoke up for Gillian. Does anyone think that N.O. would've have been as interesting without her synth & guitar flourishes? To try and pre-emptively justify Hooky's "It's not New Order without me but it was without her", he's been belittling her contribution. Shame. I can't see why there won't be new New Order material (Bernard has put out a record every three or so years fairly consistently for the past 20 or so years), but they really do need to move beyond the "two years in a studio costing £500k" bullshit as it will bankrupt them : and the BL LP cost £30k, and sounded just fine.


Agreed that it's not the amount of money spent on a recording studio that matters. So they spent too much money in the recording process of WFTSC. OK, well move on and
don't make that same mistake again.
thanks 1 user thanked Eimi for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 19/01/2013(UTC)
Debaser  
#14 Posted : 19 January 2013 04:03:36(UTC)
Debaser

Rank: Dead Soul

Groups: Registered
Joined: 03/06/2012(UTC)
Posts: 2,054
Location: here n there

Thanks: 486 times
Was thanked: 3010 time(s) in 2075 post(s)
leather-girl wrote:

Dead Dubstep? No way.... New Order would've sold themselves out too much if they actually try to make crap like dubstep. No No


I was having a bit of fun with that. But dismissing an entire genre Leather Girl? Hmm, i dunno. It's good to keep an open mind, tends to lead to creativity.
thanks 1 user thanked Debaser for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 19/01/2013(UTC)
Eimi  
#15 Posted : 19 January 2013 04:22:18(UTC)
Eimi

Rank: Member of the Movement

Groups: Registered
Joined: 29/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 688
Woman
Location: Japan

Thanks: 528 times
Was thanked: 875 time(s) in 688 post(s)
Debaser wrote:
leather-girl wrote:

Dead Dubstep? No way.... New Order would've sold themselves out too much if they actually try to make crap like dubstep. No No


I was having a bit of fun with that. But dismissing an entire genre Leather Girl? Hmm, i dunno. It's good to keep an open mind, tends to lead to creativity.


I'm quite open minded, but I hate dubstep and it's so overrated as a genre. Imagine New Order pandering to the dubstep fanatics...just stupid indeed.

Edited by user 19 January 2013 04:23:19(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

thanks 1 user thanked Eimi for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 19/01/2013(UTC)
jed the shed  
#16 Posted : 19 January 2013 04:56:27(UTC)
jed the shed

Rank: Member of the Village

Groups: Registered
Joined: 24/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 83
Location: Preston

Thanks: 37 times
Was thanked: 101 time(s) in 83 post(s)
I think they should get Stuart Price to produce their next album, he's done a good job with 586, it seems to me to be a good direction for them to go in, bt still keep a mix of the guitar based tracks too, I think it would be silly for them to try to keep the hooky bass sound they need to move on if they want to retain any credibility, and Hooky would never shut up about it too, as much as I love his playing he does go on!
thanks 1 user thanked jed the shed for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 19/01/2013(UTC)
Big Mouth Julio  
#17 Posted : 19 January 2013 09:23:37(UTC)
Big Mouth Julio

Rank: Member of the Brotherhood

Groups: Registered
Joined: 26/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 316
Man
Location: São Luís - Brasil

Thanks: 26 times
Was thanked: 346 time(s) in 318 post(s)
Anyone here worked with Bernard Sumner? So shut up!

He thinks he is the owner of the world. Gillian and Steve are working with him for only one reason, MONEY!!!
Finsbury Park 2002
Brasilia 2006
Sao Paulo 2006 1st Night
Sao Paulo 2006 2nd Night
Sao Paulo 2011
Lima 2013
Bogota 2013
thanks 1 user thanked Big Mouth Julio for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 19/01/2013(UTC)
Debaser  
#18 Posted : 19 January 2013 09:47:20(UTC)
Debaser

Rank: Dead Soul

Groups: Registered
Joined: 03/06/2012(UTC)
Posts: 2,054
Location: here n there

Thanks: 486 times
Was thanked: 3010 time(s) in 2075 post(s)
Big Mouth Julio wrote:
Anyone here worked with Bernard Sumner? So shut up!

He thinks he is the owner of the world. Gillian and Steve are working with him for only one reason, MONEY!!!


I went to see Hooky on Thursday night. The tickets weren't free. He thought he was king of the band. Surprised?
thanks 1 user thanked Debaser for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 19/01/2013(UTC)
NotAMod  
#19 Posted : 19 January 2013 11:19:30(UTC)
NotAMod

Rank: Moderator

Groups: Moderators, Administrators, Registered
Joined: 24/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 653
Location: London, UK

Thanks: 176 times
Was thanked: 1040 time(s) in 655 post(s)
Big Mouth Julio wrote:
Anyone here worked with Bernard Sumner? So shut up!

He thinks he is the owner of the world. Gillian and Steve are working with him for only one reason, MONEY!!!


Have you worked with Bernard Sumner, Julio? If not, how are you qualified to say he "thinks he is the owner of the world"?

The quick answer is you're not and perhaps even less qualified to have an opinion on Sumner because you're an out-and-out Hooky sycophant.

Oh, and from a moderator point of view please don't tell people on here to "shut up".

Edited by user 19 January 2013 11:25:10(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

thanks 3 users thanked NotAMod for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 19/01/2013(UTC), Eimi on 19/01/2013(UTC), ersatz01 on 19/01/2013(UTC)
surface  
#20 Posted : 19 January 2013 11:24:02(UTC)
surface

Rank: Member of the Republic

Groups: Registered
Joined: 27/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 132
Location: Alderley Edge

Was thanked: 194 time(s) in 138 post(s)
Big Mouth Julio wrote:
Anyone here worked with Bernard Sumner? So shut up!

He thinks he is the owner of the world. Gillian and Steve are working with him for only one reason, MONEY!!!


Can see Phil and Tom doing it for the money but come on Steve and Gillian - have you seen their house?
thanks 1 user thanked surface for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 19/01/2013(UTC)
Bill  
#21 Posted : 19 January 2013 11:24:53(UTC)
Bill

Rank: Member with Substance

Groups: Registered
Joined: 28/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 1,303
Man
Location: UK

Was thanked: 1611 time(s) in 1339 post(s)
NotAMod wrote:
Big Mouth Julio wrote:
Anyone here worked with Bernard Sumner? So shut up!

He thinks he is the owner of the world. Gillian and Steve are working with him for only one reason, MONEY!!!


Have you worked with Bernard Sumner, Julio? If not, how are you qualified to say he "thinks he is the owner of the world"?

Oh, and from a moderator point of view please don't tell people on here to "shut up".


I'm just confused by Julio's post. He first seems to be defending Barney then seems to be slagging him off :scratcheshead:
thanks 1 user thanked Bill for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 19/01/2013(UTC)
NotAMod  
#22 Posted : 19 January 2013 11:36:45(UTC)
NotAMod

Rank: Moderator

Groups: Moderators, Administrators, Registered
Joined: 24/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 653
Location: London, UK

Thanks: 176 times
Was thanked: 1040 time(s) in 655 post(s)
I think you're probably wasting time trying to get sense out of his posts, Johnny Smile
thanks 2 users thanked NotAMod for this useful post.
jed the shed on 19/01/2013(UTC), ROCKET MICK on 19/01/2013(UTC)
markreed  
#23 Posted : 19 January 2013 13:25:24(UTC)
markreed

Rank: Member of the Republic

Groups: Registered
Joined: 02/05/2012(UTC)
Posts: 229
Location: Somewhere, GB

Thanks: 3 times
Was thanked: 353 time(s) in 229 post(s)
The only reason anybody works for anybody is money, whats your point? I was actually considering how stable the N.O. lineup has been in the past 30 years - in all that time, only one person in the band has left because they were fucked off with Barney.
thanks 3 users thanked markreed for this useful post.
Eimi on 19/01/2013(UTC), ROCKET MICK on 19/01/2013(UTC), ersatz01 on 19/01/2013(UTC)
ersatz01  
#24 Posted : 19 January 2013 14:55:26(UTC)
ersatz01

Rank: Member of the Village

Groups: Registered
Joined: 25/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 76
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Thanks: 55 times
Was thanked: 112 time(s) in 75 post(s)
leather-girl wrote:
Debaser wrote:
leather-girl wrote:

Dead Dubstep? No way.... New Order would've sold themselves out too much if they actually try to make crap like dubstep. No No


I was having a bit of fun with that. But dismissing an entire genre Leather Girl? Hmm, i dunno. It's good to keep an open mind, tends to lead to creativity.


I'm quite open minded, but I hate dubstep and it's so overrated as a genre. Imagine New Order pandering to the dubstep fanatics...just stupid indeed.


We're actually living in a post-dubstep world now.
thanks 2 users thanked ersatz01 for this useful post.
Eimi on 19/01/2013(UTC), ROCKET MICK on 19/01/2013(UTC)
Big Mouth Julio  
#25 Posted : 19 January 2013 17:36:31(UTC)
Big Mouth Julio

Rank: Member of the Brotherhood

Groups: Registered
Joined: 26/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 316
Man
Location: São Luís - Brasil

Thanks: 26 times
Was thanked: 346 time(s) in 318 post(s)
NotAMod wrote:
Big Mouth Julio wrote:
Anyone here worked with Bernard Sumner? So shut up!

He thinks he is the owner of the world. Gillian and Steve are working with him for only one reason, MONEY!!!


Have you worked with Bernard Sumner, Julio? If not, how are you qualified to say he "thinks he is the owner of the world"?

The quick answer is you're not and perhaps even less qualified to have an opinion on Sumner because you're an out-and-out Hooky sycophant.

Oh, and from a moderator point of view please don't tell people on here to "shut up".


Ok Moderator. But you cannot also call me sycophant, respect me! Alright???
I cannot say shut up, I am very sorry.
Is this a forum that we can express our opinions or not? I don't like Bernard Sumner as a person. But like Gillian and Steve. Oh, Phil too.

Finsbury Park 2002
Brasilia 2006
Sao Paulo 2006 1st Night
Sao Paulo 2006 2nd Night
Sao Paulo 2011
Lima 2013
Bogota 2013
thanks 1 user thanked Big Mouth Julio for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 20/01/2013(UTC)
Users browsing this topic
Guest
3 Pages123>
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF 2.1.1 | YAF © 2003-2024, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 2.411 seconds.