logo
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error
Factory Records 2 CD Remasters
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Previous Topic Next Topic
Nightmare  
#1 Posted : 20 December 2012 00:19:00(UTC)
Nightmare

Rank: Candidate

Groups: Registered
Joined: 19/12/2012(UTC)
Posts: 4
Man

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 4 time(s) in 4 post(s)
Was there a topic on the old site about the errors loaded in these reissues? I've been searching all over the place for it and have had no luck.


I just wanted to share this photo. Even if they don't have errors in it, what I have heard from these reissues they are extremely terrible. My friend bought the Low Life version and lucky for him his 2nd disc was not infected. (I still have all of my QWest original print versions of the albums, including Power Corruption & Lies that had The Beach and Blue Monday on the album). I wanted to share this picture.


This is what Shell Shock from Substance looks like, and what Shell Shock from Low Life Bonus Disc looks like


UserPostedImage



The only N.O. album I have been missing all these years is Technique, and I spent 17 dollars on a brand new QWest version (I guess they are hard to find now) and I don't regret going after these Rhino remasters one bit, even if they are not full of errors, the loudness is absolutely terrible. Nothing beats the original mastering of Low Life, Power, Corruption, & Lies, or Substance. Rhino also destroyed the Depeche Mode albums with their crappy remasters throwing in a bonus DVD to get you to buy it in a fancy Digipak, and funny thing is, my version of People Are People the booklet wasn't even stapled correctly.


But you can look at the screenshot above I made in audacity. Everything is drowned out in loudness. Besides The Rolling Stones 2009 UMe reissues, these are perhaps the worst loudness remasters I've ever come across, but the Rolling Stones newest reissues are a bit worse.
Back to top
thanks 1 user thanked Nightmare for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 20/12/2012(UTC)
Sponsor
Back to top  
blunt laser  
#2 Posted : 20 December 2012 17:10:49(UTC)
blunt laser

Rank: Member of the Village

Groups: Registered
Joined: 21/05/2012(UTC)
Posts: 55
Location: London

Thanks: 7 times
Was thanked: 68 time(s) in 55 post(s)
I just received the fixed Low-Life remaster without the drop out in Sunrise. The actual album doesn't sound too bad. I agree that the bonus discs are still mastered pretty poorly but are the actual album remasters that bad? I remember the original |Low-Life cd sounding pretty thin. I could be wrong. I'd be interested to know which are the best versions to get. I have the original Factory Cd's. Are they any good?
Back to top
thanks 1 user thanked blunt laser for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 22/12/2012(UTC)
blunt laser  
#3 Posted : 20 December 2012 17:13:39(UTC)
blunt laser

Rank: Member of the Village

Groups: Registered
Joined: 21/05/2012(UTC)
Posts: 55
Location: London

Thanks: 7 times
Was thanked: 68 time(s) in 55 post(s)
Sorry, almost forgot. Here's the link for the original thread.

http://www.neworderonlin...List.aspx?ThreadID=43684
Back to top
thanks 1 user thanked blunt laser for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 22/12/2012(UTC)
Nightmare  
#4 Posted : 20 December 2012 18:10:02(UTC)
Nightmare

Rank: Candidate

Groups: Registered
Joined: 19/12/2012(UTC)
Posts: 4
Man

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 4 time(s) in 4 post(s)
blunt laser wrote:
I just received the fixed Low-Life remaster without the drop out in Sunrise. The actual album doesn't sound too bad. I agree that the bonus discs are still mastered pretty poorly but are the actual album remasters that bad? I remember the original |Low-Life cd sounding pretty thin. I could be wrong. I'd be interested to know which are the best versions to get. I have the original Factory Cd's. Are they any good?





I don't know how the actual disc sounds but I assume that if the remaster is this loud, the original disc will be too.


They sound terrible like the new Rolling Stone remasters. I wasted 40 bucks on tons of those new Stones remasters only to find out they were worthless and everything was lost in the loudness. Sticky Fingers is perhaps the worst, the organ in I Got the Blues just drowns everything out.


Rhino did these remasters, and that's why they are super loud. The Depeche Mode reissues some years back they did that had the bonus dvds were also terrible. Here is a screenshot I did of People of People comparing the original Sire records version to the Rhino remaster


UserPostedImage



I have never bought any of the Factory original pressings, but I'd highly recommend the original pressings from QWest records (What we get here in the U.S.) I have almost all of them, once Technique comes in the mail I will, and the sound quality is amazing. I'm disappointed cause I really wanted the 2 disc version of Power, Corruption and Lies only for the original 12" of Confusion, but if they are this loud errors or not, I'm not wasting 20 bucks on that.

It's really funny that despite all these super cool remasters we get today, the original pressings of CD's sound so much better. I'd trade all my Stones and Judas Priest reissues for the original first pressings of the cds. The Jimi Hendrix remasters are louder than the originals but there is a fine line between that and the Rhino reissues. While Hendrix reissues are louder, not everything is drowned out in utter loudness.

Edited by user 20 December 2012 18:14:23(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified
Back to top
thanks 1 user thanked Nightmare for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 22/12/2012(UTC)
Biginoil  
#5 Posted : 20 December 2012 22:39:33(UTC)
Biginoil

Rank: Member of the Republic

Groups: Registered
Joined: 29/05/2012(UTC)
Posts: 146
Location: UK

Thanks: 84 times
Was thanked: 226 time(s) in 148 post(s)
Fuck off

Ner ner ner ner ner
Back to top
thanks 1 user thanked Biginoil for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 22/12/2012(UTC)
Johnny James  
#6 Posted : 20 December 2012 23:14:30(UTC)
Johnny James

Rank: Member of the Brotherhood

Groups: Registered
Joined: 29/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 451
Location: UK

Was thanked: 1045 time(s) in 451 post(s)
UserPostedImage

Perhaps you could explain exactly what you think you've proved with this screenshot? What does this show? I don't think you know what you're looking for when you do this.

What I can see is a track that, apart from being slightly longer at the end, is just a bit louder (normalized even). Maybe a couple of the original peaks have been lightly limited and pretty much ALL of the original dynamics appear to have been preserved.

The (fixed) double disc editions are not 'drowned out in loudness', they have 'some' limiting, but it isn't too excessive. Try a screenshot of the 'Singles' double to see some actual bad limiting.
Back to top
thanks 1 user thanked Johnny James for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 22/12/2012(UTC)
Nightmare  
#7 Posted : 21 December 2012 00:15:55(UTC)
Nightmare

Rank: Candidate

Groups: Registered
Joined: 19/12/2012(UTC)
Posts: 4
Man

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 4 time(s) in 4 post(s)
Johnny James wrote:
UserPostedImage

Perhaps you could explain exactly what you think you've proved with this screenshot? What does this show? I don't think you know what you're looking for when you do this.

What I can see is a track that, apart from being slightly longer at the end, is just a bit louder (normalized even). Maybe a couple of the original peaks have been lightly limited and pretty much ALL of the original dynamics appear to have been preserved.

The (fixed) double disc editions are not 'drowned out in loudness', they have 'some' limiting, but it isn't too excessive. Try a screenshot of the 'Singles' double to see some actual bad limiting.



I'm showing you how all the music is lost in loudness with the high dynamics. The top one is the way it's supposed to look. The bottom is longer, because it's the album version of the song, and I used the album 'People are People' with the shorter version (Without the outro)


In the first screenshot where I used the Low life bonus disc version of Shell Shock, something is really wrong there. A song should not be lost in such high loudness dynamics. These aren't the only ones.


If none of this makes sense, watch this video.

Back to top
thanks 1 user thanked Nightmare for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 22/12/2012(UTC)
Biginoil  
#8 Posted : 21 December 2012 00:32:51(UTC)
Biginoil

Rank: Member of the Republic

Groups: Registered
Joined: 29/05/2012(UTC)
Posts: 146
Location: UK

Thanks: 84 times
Was thanked: 226 time(s) in 148 post(s)
Never mind what it looks like. How does it feel?

#pisswizard

Ner ner ner ner ner
Back to top
thanks 1 user thanked Biginoil for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 22/12/2012(UTC)
Johnny James  
#9 Posted : 21 December 2012 00:44:13(UTC)
Johnny James

Rank: Member of the Brotherhood

Groups: Registered
Joined: 29/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 451
Location: UK

Was thanked: 1045 time(s) in 451 post(s)
What I'm saying 'Nightmare' is that I get it, but I don't think YOU do. Maybe you need to do a little more research before commenting on something you've hardly understood.

The Shellshock example does show a certain amount of limiting, though it's not too bad, the Depeche Mode one however has hardly any, yet you think it does. The signal being normalized is not in itself a problem.

Edited by user 21 December 2012 00:47:29(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified
Back to top
thanks 2 users thanked Johnny James for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 22/12/2012(UTC), Fallsound on 13/01/2013(UTC)
Users browsing this topic
Guest (3)
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF 2.1.1 | YAF © 2003-2024, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.553 seconds.