logo
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

2 Pages<12
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
El Jarvo  
#26 Posted : 07 October 2012 23:38:33(UTC)
El Jarvo

Rank: Member of the Brotherhood

Groups: Registered
Joined: 01/05/2012(UTC)
Posts: 313
Location: No.18

Thanks: 4 times
Was thanked: 443 time(s) in 313 post(s)
effect returned wrote:
i dont think a new order album needs hookys bass to be honest because it got to the stage where it was obligatory on everything they put out before he left but your right its probably better to wait until we've heard the album.


Won't Lost Sirens have Hooky's bass on it, or do you think they've totally mixed him out? Oh well
thanks 1 user thanked El Jarvo for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 08/10/2012(UTC)
NotAMod  
#27 Posted : 08 October 2012 00:05:17(UTC)
NotAMod

Rank: Moderator

Groups: Moderators, Administrators, Registered
Joined: 24/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 671
Location: London, UK

Thanks: 180 times
Was thanked: 1105 time(s) in 673 post(s)
El Jarvo wrote:
Won't Lost Sirens have Hooky's bass on it, or do you think they've totally mixed him out? Oh well


Even though I quite like Hellbent it's obvious that the bass on it is a bit "phoned in"; it's not even there for the first couple of minutes of the song and then suddenly appears, noodles up the scale a bit, noodles down before fading. Not one of his more memorable riffs. That may not be Hooky's fault though, he might have wanted more of himself on there and/or the track mixed differently but was overruled. Who knows.

Despite everything I do hope there is Hooky bass on Lost Sirens, it is meant to be the "final" Hook/Morris/Sumner co-write after all.

Edited by user 09 October 2012 23:48:00(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

thanks 1 user thanked NotAMod for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 08/10/2012(UTC)
Cranelane  
#28 Posted : 08 October 2012 00:14:08(UTC)
Cranelane

Rank: Member of the Brotherhood

Groups: Registered
Joined: 24/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 378
Location: Cork

Thanks: 144 times
Was thanked: 513 time(s) in 388 post(s)
Tim wrote:
Nail almost hit squarely. It's all about royalties, and a feud that has been going on since the demise of Factory. Ever wondered why only Bernard-written songs get played at gigs? Let's just say that someone who shall remain nameless but not beardless didn't get the same royalty split after the demise of Factory that he did before, and it has rankled somewhat ever since.


I wonder was the split unfavourable just to Hooky or did this also apply to The Other Two, with Bernard getting the biggest slice and the other 3 getting equal amounts...
thanks 1 user thanked Cranelane for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 08/10/2012(UTC)
effect returned  
#29 Posted : 08 October 2012 11:35:37(UTC)
effect returned

Rank: Young Offender

Groups: Registered
Joined: 27/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 47

Thanks: 7 times
Was thanked: 73 time(s) in 48 post(s)
Cranelane wrote:
Tim wrote:
Nail almost hit squarely. It's all about royalties, and a feud that has been going on since the demise of Factory. Ever wondered why only Bernard-written songs get played at gigs? Let's just say that someone who shall remain nameless but not beardless didn't get the same royalty split after the demise of Factory that he did before, and it has rankled somewhat ever since.


I wonder was the split unfavourable just to Hooky or did this also apply to The Other Two, with Bernard getting the biggest slice and the other 3 getting equal amounts...


Generally performance royalties are split equally within the band with backing singers etc getting a wage, thats what usually happens.

Id be surprised if there was any different with new order but i dont know for sure.

The way it works normally is, bands are paid a fee or a percentage of the gate,then they receive performance royalties for gigs that appear on tv,radio etc.

Songwriting royalties are different, it could well be if bernard wrote most of the songs in the factory time he would be probably have got a more favourable deal with songwriting royalties from republic onwards and possibly a better share of the back catalogue royalties as a result of being so punk or generous during the factory time.

If tim is right and only bernard written songs are being played which are essentially the hits then you would have to say that bernard isnt being unreasonable claiming what he is entitled to and a bit extra.

Along with electronic money that was lost on factory for making hookys revenge album.

It could well be that bernard is earning more from the songs because he is getting paid for the band doing a cover of his work but its all guesswork on my part.

I know from experience its better that everyone gets what they are in entitled to in a band when it comes to credit or money because resentment builds up.
thanks 2 users thanked effect returned for this useful post.
Cranelane on 08/10/2012(UTC), ROCKET MICK on 10/10/2012(UTC)
effect returned  
#30 Posted : 08 October 2012 11:41:21(UTC)
effect returned

Rank: Young Offender

Groups: Registered
Joined: 27/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 47

Thanks: 7 times
Was thanked: 73 time(s) in 48 post(s)
El Jarvo wrote:
effect returned wrote:
i dont think a new order album needs hookys bass to be honest because it got to the stage where it was obligatory on everything they put out before he left but your right its probably better to wait until we've heard the album.


Won't Lost Sirens have Hooky's bass on it, or do you think they've totally mixed him out? Oh well


ill judge the songs first.
thanks 1 user thanked effect returned for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 10/10/2012(UTC)
markreed  
#31 Posted : 08 October 2012 12:46:36(UTC)
markreed

Rank: Member of the Republic

Groups: Registered
Joined: 02/05/2012(UTC)
Posts: 229
Location: Somewhere, GB

Thanks: 3 times
Was thanked: 353 time(s) in 229 post(s)
On the basis of what I have read :

Revenge and Electronic both had a promo budget and advance circa £1m. Revenge tanked and sold about 14 albums. Electronic ruled the world. Tony Wilson decided that, rather than pay Barney the Electronic royalties, to offset against the loss of Revenge and not pay Barney, they're both New Order anyway.

Come 1993, and Barney quite rightly wants his cash : the royalties which were not paid by Wilson.

Come the London deal, BS gets a larger deal as a result with Hooky taking reduced royalties to compensate for the missiing £1,000,000. For some reason, come 2006, I imagine the deal has not been renegotiated. That's my understanding. Could be totally wrong mind you, but it's called "showbusiness" for a reason.
thanks 1 user thanked markreed for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 10/10/2012(UTC)
Biginoil  
#32 Posted : 09 October 2012 03:05:53(UTC)
Biginoil

Rank: Member of the Republic

Groups: Registered
Joined: 29/05/2012(UTC)
Posts: 146
Location: UK

Thanks: 84 times
Was thanked: 226 time(s) in 148 post(s)
More, if you can take it

Quote:
Bernard always used to say that one of our big problems was that I was a lark and he was a wren.


Quote:
This is one of the problems with New Order. When you're not drinking, you have no escape.


Quote:
I thought, when I was recovering, that people would go out of their way to help me. The sad state of the world was, nobody gave a f*** and everyone carried on as normal.


Quote:
Is that defamation, saying he had a deckchair?


Quote:
As Pete Saville said to me last night, "I wish there was a grown-up." But there isn't.

Ner ner ner ner ner
thanks 1 user thanked Biginoil for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 10/10/2012(UTC)
Johnny James  
#33 Posted : 09 October 2012 03:10:34(UTC)
Johnny James

Rank: Member of the Brotherhood

Groups: Registered
Joined: 29/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 451
Location: UK

Was thanked: 1045 time(s) in 451 post(s)
As George Herbert said "Living well is the best revenge". Hooky take note.
thanks 1 user thanked Johnny James for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 10/10/2012(UTC)
El Jarvo  
#34 Posted : 09 October 2012 03:25:07(UTC)
El Jarvo

Rank: Member of the Brotherhood

Groups: Registered
Joined: 01/05/2012(UTC)
Posts: 313
Location: No.18

Thanks: 4 times
Was thanked: 443 time(s) in 313 post(s)


You forgot this one -

Quote:
I used joydiv.org, which had a list of the gigs. Once we transcribed that list and went through it all, I noticed that some of them were wrong. My book contains the actual, right gigs.


Old Monkey will be up in arms!
thanks 1 user thanked El Jarvo for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 10/10/2012(UTC)
Biginoil  
#35 Posted : 09 October 2012 03:45:49(UTC)
Biginoil

Rank: Member of the Republic

Groups: Registered
Joined: 29/05/2012(UTC)
Posts: 146
Location: UK

Thanks: 84 times
Was thanked: 226 time(s) in 148 post(s)
He also says that the highest point of being in Joy Division was a gig where he managed to smack 12 people with his headstock while the rest of the band played on and ignored the fact that people were spitting at Ian. You might laugh at this, surely writing the bassline to Atmosphere trumps this as a moment in time?

He also talks about taking on a bouncer at a Light gig recently. Both remind me of the New Order gig in Liverpool where Hooky did his best to sort out the knuckle-headed security who spent the night ineptly and aggressively spoiling it for everyone. Chucking people out for dancing, shining their maglights into everyone's faces. Relentless inspection of tickets. Cunts. Barney totally ignored him and carried on with the gig which felt a bit disloyal. I really wish the band had walked off that night, it would have been the right thing to do. Maybe the security would have calmed down so they could come back on or maybe we could have just torn the place to pieces like we wanted to. I'd already picked the two morons I was going for. Saying that, I'm glad they stayed because it was the best I ever saw Hooky play. I'm listening to the recording right now. That anger seems to come out in his playing and he looked like a man possessed. Listen to him roar during Ceremony. Best of all, he caught one of the bouncers a peach with his headstock as he walked past bothering people. That was the biggest cheer of the night and our sign that it was okay to go down the front after all. I actually turned to my girlfriend and said "we can down the front now, Hooky says it's okay".

I've never seen or heard anything like it and , sad as it might sound, Hooky was my hero that night. He was there for us when nobody else seemed to care.

I'm going to get into a fight in Mexico and see if Tom is there for me like that.

EDIT: I'm not really.

Edited by user 09 October 2012 03:48:53(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified


Ner ner ner ner ner
thanks 1 user thanked Biginoil for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 10/10/2012(UTC)
Gazman  
#36 Posted : 09 October 2012 04:31:40(UTC)
Gazman

Rank: Member of the Brotherhood

Groups: Registered
Joined: 23/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 369
Location: Bitch View Too

Thanks: 8 times
Was thanked: 481 time(s) in 383 post(s)
From this
review that was posted in the Ceremony forum


Quote:
Yet, from start to finish, nothing about this show felt like a cash-in tribute to their former selves – which is a lot more than can be said for Hook’s outfit the Light, an ensemble of nobodies that has toured more than once on the reputation of Joy Division, reviving both Unknown Pleasures (1979) and Closer (1980) at L.A. venues over the years, despite Hook being its only genuine member. That’s the thorniest among many issues separating the bassist from his New Order mates.


just thought id throw it in...
Lovely Scottish crumpet
Nod
thanks 1 user thanked Gazman for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 10/10/2012(UTC)
Eimi  
#37 Posted : 09 October 2012 04:51:51(UTC)
Eimi

Rank: Member of the Movement

Groups: Registered
Joined: 29/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 688
Woman
Location: Japan

Thanks: 528 times
Was thanked: 875 time(s) in 688 post(s)
Gazman wrote:
From this
review that was posted in the Ceremony forum


Quote:
Yet, from start to finish, nothing about this show felt like a cash-in tribute to their former selves – which is a lot more than can be said for Hook’s outfit the Light, an ensemble of nobodies that has toured more than once on the reputation of Joy Division, reviving both Unknown Pleasures (1979) and Closer (1980) at L.A. venues over the years, despite Hook being its only genuine member. That’s the thorniest among many issues separating the bassist from his New Order mates.


just thought id throw it in...


Interesting...
thanks 1 user thanked Eimi for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 10/10/2012(UTC)
Geri  
#38 Posted : 09 October 2012 07:30:32(UTC)
Geri

Rank: Member of the Republic

Groups: Registered
Joined: 24/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 192
Woman
Location: Tynecastle

Thanks: 9 times
Was thanked: 220 time(s) in 194 post(s)
so we're not the only ones moaning about what's he doing (well, the majority on here anyway).

I haven't read all of this thread, but going by the title alone, I think it's gone way beyond that. If I was going through the courts to settle some dispute with an old friend/colleague, there would be no way it could just be forgotten about afterwards and live happily ever after .... the damage this time must surely be permanent.
I know, you know, we believe in a chosen few ...
thanks 2 users thanked Geri for this useful post.
Biginoil on 09/10/2012(UTC), ROCKET MICK on 10/10/2012(UTC)
Volturno  
#39 Posted : 09 October 2012 19:33:07(UTC)
Volturno

Rank: Member of the Village

Groups: Registered
Joined: 29/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 86
Location: Rio de Janeiro

Thanks: 17 times
Was thanked: 97 time(s) in 87 post(s)
Gazman wrote:
From this
review that was posted in the Ceremony forum


Quote:
Yet, from start to finish, nothing about this show felt like a cash-in tribute to their former selves – which is a lot more than can be said for Hook’s outfit the Light, an ensemble of nobodies that has toured more than once on the reputation of Joy Division, reviving both Unknown Pleasures (1979) and Closer (1980) at L.A. venues over the years, despite Hook being its only genuine member. That’s the thorniest among many issues separating the bassist from his New Order mates.


just thought id throw it in...

The guys goes as far as to suggest Hooky's playing style is easy to pull off. I wonder why no one ever came close to writing as many good lines, then? Confused
There's a reason Bernard acknowledges his quality even in the middle of this feud.
thanks 1 user thanked Volturno for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 10/10/2012(UTC)
Users browsing this topic
Guest (3)
2 Pages<12
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF 2.1.1 | YAF © 2003-2024, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.629 seconds.