logo
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

2 Pages12>
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Linus Solanki  
#1 Posted : 27 September 2012 06:41:52(UTC)
Linus Solanki

Rank: Member of the Movement

Groups: Registered
Joined: 10/05/2012(UTC)
Posts: 629
Location: NYC

Thanks: 59 times
Was thanked: 1027 time(s) in 649 post(s)
http://www.godisinthetvz...iew-peter-hook-part-one/

UserPostedImage






Peter Hook clearly has a few things on his mind this afternoon, we were given twenty five minutes with the legendary Joy Division and New Order bassist Peter Hook to talk about his new book ‘Unknown Pleasures: Inside Joy Division’ his side of the(much talked about) Joy Division story which is out this week. But he spoke to us for nearly an hour and he’s bullish about those that criticise him. He speaks honestly and openly with a warmth and a wit that belies those accusations of bitterness. He seems genuine in his continued attempts to keep the Factory flame and the memory of Tony Wilson alive by reopening the building celebrate the legacy of his two big bands New Order and Joy Division. Whatever your views upon his mining of his own ‘heritage’ or ‘tribute acts’ he makes a good point he was in the band afterall and if he’s a heritage act ‘then what are the current line up of New Order?’

His new book is just as genuine, quite apart from many boring ghost written rock books Hooky fondly reccounts in unfettered northern slang his childhood in Salford. How he became a lead bass player with a distinctive style and the mythologised tale of a band from Manchester called Joy Division whose legacy continues to live on and on despite their short life as a band who lost their iconic frontman Ian Curtis.

What was the motivation behind giving your side of the Joy Division story?

Obviously this had never come into my sphere of thinking, doing books and stuff like that. I must admit, being an author does have a certain gravity to it, whereas ‘musician’ doesn’t seem to. People seem to regard you in a different way. What happened was, when I was doing the sleeve notes for the Hacienda CD, the guy was like, fucking hell, ‘you’re full of stories you, you should write a book!’ and that was what kind of inspired the Hacienda book. It was quite difficult, I just thought that you journalists did fuck all! As soon as I started to write properly I realised how difficult it is and how easy people view it, it’s a hard thing to do.

So the Hacienda book took about three years, but it was Mick Mills’ book on Joy Division… actually I read it and was like, for fuck sakes, I’m sick of reading books about Joy Division by people who weren’t there! And it was as simple as that really, because there were a lot of errors, I’m sure Bernard will say there are a lot of errors in mine, but everyone has their own perceptions. So I thought, inspired by the success of the Hacienda book and the satisfaction I got from doing it, I thought, right, let’s do Joy Division next on the list.


Was it important to give a bit of context about your childhood in the book, before reaching the point where you met Bernard and the others and started Joy Division?

The way I do them is chronological. The interesting thing about my and Bernard’s relationship in particular, is that it started when we were very young (although at the moment you wouldn’t think I knew him at all!). But we did start when we were 11, which from what I gather is quite unusual, if you look at the Rolling Stones, Keith Richards, Mick Jagger, etc, they’ve been together a long time but in general it’s not the norm.

The interesting part of Joy Division is we were together from the age of eleven, up until discovering the Sex Pistols neither of us were particularly musical, and the interesting thing is both of us have maintained that and been successful musicians since. So the chances of the pair of you doing that, having seen a Punk group in 1977: Paddy Power wouldn’t give you very good odds on that, would they ?! (laughs).

Would you say that you developed a better understanding of each other because of how well you knew each other?

The problem is… with our relationship now, it’s very hard to be objective, it’s very hard to look back on it fondly. It is a bit prejudiced shall we say. When I came to do the book I was desperately trying not to be influenced by that.

The story of Joy Division I felt is very very special. It’s quite simple really, considering how we were only professional for six months… It’s amazing the heritage, the influence and the plaudits you receive. We were professional for six months for the Buzzcocks tour and Ian died in May… It’s bittersweet really because it’s tempered by the frustration and helplessness of his illness: I mean his illness didn’t just take him, it took Joy Division as well…

How has Salford changed since he grew up there? Does being there bring back painful memories for him or is it a positive experience?

The interesting thing about writing the book was, I knew all about Joy Division as I’d lived with the story for years and years. But I’d forgotten a lot of my own childhood, and my mother’s dead unfortunately, and so is my Dad. I learned more about Salford and my Mum, and my life, doing interviews with my mother’s sister actually, I actually learned more about my life for the book, so for me it was quite a revelation. For me I saw Salford change, it hasn’t changed that much since I left and moved to Liverpool to live near the Happy Mondays.

But really you watch the deterioration of the community, it’s a little bit too deep to go into here. The saddest thing was, the deterioration of the community of people. When we lived there… it was more about helping each other and that thing about throwing your door open, everyone knew each other. Nowadays people are a lot more isolated, it’s a contradiction really because you’ve got this wonderful progress that opens the world up to you but shuts your neighbour off, you’d have to say in all honesty it’s not been good. It’s easy to sit there typing and doing all that crap and and if your mate messages you just be like ‘fuck I’ll Facebook you.’

I was talking to the cleaner this morning, he was an old geezer like me, and we were talking about lighting coal fires and I really hope my daughter will never have to do that… Some progress is good and some is bad.

I suppose sometimes you never know who is reading Facebook it is a form of broadcasting afterall..

Yeah I used to fall for it in the old days. My lawyer says my send button needs a 24 hour delay. I would print things on my blog and then I’d think shit, I shouldn’t have done that. I still go by the maxim, you really shouldn’t say something that you wouldn’t say to someone’s face. Twitter and all that lot… some geek sat in his bedroom in outer Munktee or whatever… you just wouldn’t do it to their face, would you?

Trolls by nature are cowards. I think what’s interesting, that thing over the weekend about Noel Fielding, about getting his followers ganging up on people, that’s fucking terrible isn’t it?It’s like Fagin isn’t it. You’d have to say even though Ricky Gervais fell for it too, it’s not very clever behaviour is it? Say you didn’t like my book and I got all my mates to come and throw bricks through your window. You would be like, he doesn’t take criticism easily does he? It’s something you have to be careful of, but I think the education of it is coming.

Do you feel any pressure living up to his musical legacy?How do you respond to the criticism surrounding your celebration of your past?

What happens is people make you feel guilty about celebrating your legacy, and I was reading an interview last week from Phil Cunningham and Tom Chapman in the Japan Times, slagging me off for being a heritage act. And… I was like, but what are New Order?They’ve not even got the correct line up, they are a heritage act as well.

I actually phoned Phil Cunningham up after that, and he was like, for Tom Chapman, the new New Order bassist who spends his whole life emulating me , saying that I was a heritage act is like the pot calling the kettle black. What happened with me was, Factory, they reacted against it, they rounded on me and accused me of using the Factory legacy. From my point of view, I’d already lost Hacienda, when my mate offered me the opportunity to save the Factory building- which New Order paid for by the way- and it was a lovely building , even before anything else.

How can it be disgusting and horrible to play your own music? And what has always irritated me was, why, why is it disgusting and horrible to play Joy Division music when you are doing it as well? I got slagged off for doing Joy Division songs but we’ve had the biggest resurgence of ‘Madchester’ this year. So maybe I was ahead of the curve? The last time I saw the Stone Roses the Manager was paying people to go and see them. The next time I go there’s 250,000 for a new musician it must be really frustrating to watch us old farts never go….

In a recent interview with the Guardian, David Bryne said ‘It feels like the end of history in pop music’….

In a funny way if you hear a great piece of music it evokes a memory: the first time you have an E or the first time you bunked up at a gig, whatever memory it evokes and that’s what makes it comfortable and nice. I was reading that thing from Bernard on Radio Six talking about writing new music. And really all the interviews they’ve done, the first question he’s asked by journalists is ‘will you write new music?’ But The funniest thing is nobody wants to hear new music, they just want to hear the old stuff!Ha ha.. If we played new music people used to scream ‘Playyyy Blue Monnndayyy!!’ It really is a contradiction and totally anachronistic.

There’s this book by Simon Reynolds called Retromania and whilst I’m not that negative about the future of music he does have a point, there is a sense that the music world is repeating and rehashing itself over and over again..

Two of the best gigs I’ve seen in a long time this year were Tinie Tempah and… Example. If you were going to be pedantic you would say that it’s not new music, but it is good music. Tinie Tempah and Labyrinth are writing great pop tunes which are a great hybrid of house. When you get to my age you have to bear in mind that kids hearing Tinie Tempah have nothing to cross reference it too.

When you say to someone who is a mad Oasis fan, you talk about the Beatles and they’re just like, who are the Beatles?The older you get, or the more educated you get, in music, the more you can’t take it on face value, so old buggers like me and David Bryne are going to say ‘Oh this reminds me of…’

I was watching the greatest programme of Wilson Picket rocking out to an all black audience in 1960s America. It was great man, it just shows you the Stones and the Beatles nicked the whole bleeding lot.

Nothing is original really but I guess the key is being about to translate your influences and put your own spin on it…

And that is an art. The thing about Joy Division is we sat there just like every other band, we sat there listening to Iggy pop, Kraftwerk and say right, let’s do a tune like that. We’d start it, it would sound like that at the start, but by the end of it it would sound like us.

We kept getting compared to the Doors, I kept saying to Barney, who were the Doors? And big Ian was like ‘you’ve never heard the Doors?’ and we put the Doors on and we put the Doors on and we were like “Jesus we do sound like the Doors!” It was never widely reported but we played ‘Riders of the storm’ live as a gag, because everyone kept comparing us to them but nobody ever noticed. They had a brilliant frontman…

Ian was a fantastic frontman, like ,really you’re lucky when you get a frontman that good. Both Bernard and I have gone on to do lead vocals. For me, Bernard and Stephen to get through the loss of Ian and Joy Division, to go and do a band like New Order, we were really blessed there. It doesn’t happen very often really and you don’t realise how important they are until they are gone.

Is the story about you playing in the ‘lead bass’ style so that you could be heard over the band because your amp was so cheap an apocryphal tale like the Ray Davies ‘nackered amp’ story or is that really how your style developed?


I bought the amp, and bought the guitar and I thought the strings were on it for life and someone told me to buy an amp. I remember getting my mum to do the hire purchase, and I got it home and I was like, why wouldn’t it work. I bought a speaker off my old arts teacher for ten quid, he was the bass player in the Salford Jets. So by the time I got it home it sounded like ten quid: shit. The thing was I soldiered on with it for a….

The only way I could hear the guitar was when I played high, Barney had a really good Vox amp, but I couldn’t hear myself when I played low. Ian used to really like it and he was always like ‘Play it high Hooky! Play it high!It sounds great’ he was like a conductor in an orchestra. Barney Barney put some guitar on that, Steve do some jungle drums… and you’re done. Very lucky, that again shows how important Ian was…

When we reconvened after Ian died, the three of us just stood there, there was nobody to say that. It took us an age to work out how to make it work. New Order at the start was like a car with a flat tire. Unfortunately Gillian never really quite filled the gap. New Order were a bit shaky, which was actually quite interesting and endearing: sometimes we were absolutely dreadful, sometimes OK and sometimes magnificent. It was always a gamble which again for a group is quite unique.

So the fact that you put yourself at the front unlike any other bass player I can think of before that wasn’t intentional?

Janet Street Porter said to me once ‘you’re so fucking competitive you’ and I think that’s the problem with me, as soon as somebody says something like that to me I react against it, I did at school and I never stopped. Just because I was expected to be the bass player, you can’t expect me to change my personality. I mean Barney always used to accuse me of being competitive as well. The wonderful thing about Joy Division was the bass guitar was very important to all the songs. It had it’s own melody and I actually did that really well.

When we got to New Order, the only fight that I got in in New Order was the fight I had with technology. As soon as Bernard could do it on his own he started to push you out. Which is quite a normal thing. They say the drum machines were invented so ‘the singer doesn’t have to talk to the drummer’ and I guess it was the same with bass. The technology can make you very precious if you’ve done something you didn’t want anyone else to change. I loved early New Order because you always have a real combat between the vocal and the bass, and I thought it made the music very interesting, very weird and very lasting, you could listen to it over and over again. With later New Order, when we became more of a pop band, when it was just verse chorus, I just thought it got a bit boring and predictable, and the playing down of any counter melodies in my opinion made it a bit more bland. When all the remixes happened in 88, and 89, none of them would put bass on and Barney would piss himself laughing. Fantastic remix by the way, but they just dumped the bass. They were more concerned with the electronics at the time, it doesn’t happen now. But there was that period when you were just bounced off. ‘Round and Round’ remix no bass, ‘Bizarre Love Triangle’ you were off and ‘True Faith…’ you were off again…

Bit of an obvious one but what’s your favourite Joy Division bassline?

There’s so many but at the moment ‘Twenty Four Hours’. The good thing at the moment is that because I’ve been able to play them all again and doing the book and playing every song Joy Division played (apart from ‘In an Lonely Place’ which I count more as New Order )I’m an expert on Joy Division songs at the moment. Some of the songs were never played live. When Ian died we put the whole thing away, but when New Order split in 2006 and I was outside it, I started thinking why do we never do any Joy Division, why have we never celebrated any Joy Division? It didn’t make any sense once I was outside of New Order. When you were inside New Order it made perfect sense because it was your day job. You were more concentrated on that so it felt quite natural. Once I got outside of New Order and we split and I started celebrating it, it was so wonderful to get the music back. And hold your hands up and I was like, fuck it, if a heritage act can play this great music, I don’t fucking care!

I used to DJ with the Clone Roses and I swear most of the audience were so young they thought they were the Stone Roses!I used to say to the manager ‘I’m gonna start one for Joy Division’ and he was like yeah but ‘you can’t play in your own tribute band can you’?And I guess that sums up New Order, Peter Hook tribute band: New Order. (laughs).

Do you think the reason it hadn’t been broached before because some of the more devoted Joy Division fans were more guarded of the memory?

I couldn’t get my head around just playing the songs, it didn’t seem respectful, it seemed like a tribute band but when I heard Bobby Gillespie talk about doing ‘Screamadelica’ because he said ‘some of the songs were never played live and never heard’ and I thought fuck, that’s like Unknown Pleasure songs like ‘I Remember Nothing’ and ‘Candy Day’.

And I thought… Hey, I’ll do the album, and that satisfied me artistically and creatively. The thing you have to bear in mind is, most of the people who know Joy Division know the albums but not the band, the band were very different to the albums. We haven’t played a lot of the songs on ‘Closer’. The thing with Closer was we did finish it in the studio, but we didn’t have the opportunity to interpret them live, we weren’t able to finish them off because Ian died. So to actually be able to play them and get them back… I don’t care what those miserable fuckers think!(laughs) To stand there and hear and play ‘The Eternal’ and ‘Heart and Soul’ it’s great.


My favourite one is ‘The Eternal,’ it’s one of my favourite songs, regardless of the fact that it’s by Joy Division, and ‘Closer’ is one of my favourite albums. I can listen to Closer for enjoyment, which I can’t say about any New Order albums or ‘Unknown Pleasures’ really. ‘Closer’ is like someone else’s work because of the trauma. All the songs were finished, it was Martin Hannet that developed them into a very very ambient, very very layered and textured album. And he couldn’t do that on Unknown Pleasures because it was much rockier and the lyrics were more aggressive, whereas on Closer the lyrics were quite melancholy and so… I mean it deserved a different feel.

Listen mate, if I got run over by a bus this afternoon… The fact that I’ve done the book and played all the Joy Division songs makes me very happy….

Stay Tuned for part two of our interview and for Peter Hook’s opinion on how Joy Division might have sounded had Ian not died. His views on music management courses, his ‘other bands’, New Order album ‘Lost Sirens’, his career as a dj.And whether New Order will ever get back together and well his favourite cheese!

UNKNOWN PLEASURES: INSIDE JOY DIVISION BY PETER HOOK is published in Hardback by Simon & Schuster UK 1st October, 2012.

Unknown Pleasures – Inside Joy Division Peter Hook Book Tour October 2012

For full details visit https://www.facebook.com/insidejoydivision/events

Monday 1st October @ 18.00 Formal signing – HMV, Manchester
Tuesday 2nd October @ 18.30 Talk, Q&A and Signing – Foyles, Charing Cross (Sold Out)
Wednesday 3rd October @ 18.00 Formal signing – Fopp, Bristol
Thursday 4th October @ 12.30 Formal signing – WH Smiths, Birmingham
Thursday 4th October @ 19.00 Talk, signing and Q&A – Waterstones, Liverpool
Friday 5th October @ 19.30 Talk, Q&A and Signing – Ilkley Literature Festival
Saturday 6th October @ 19.30 Talk, Q&A and Signing – Morley Literature Festival
Monday 8th October @ 19.00 Talk Q&A and Signing – Easons, Dublin
Tuesday 9th October @ 12.30 Formal signing – Waterstones Glasgow
Tuesday 9th October @ 18.30 Talk, Q&A and Signing – Waterstones Edinburgh
Wednesday 10th October @ 19.30 Talk Q&A and Signing – UCLAN, Preston
Tuesday 16th October @ 19.30 Talk Q&A and Signing – Off The Shelf Literature Festival, Sheffield
Wednesday 24th October @ 19.30 Talk Q&A and Signing – Chester Literary Festival

Unknown Pleasures – Peter Hook And The Light Live Tour November 2012

Friday 16th November Kasbah, Coventry
Saturday 17th November 53 Degrees, Preston
Sunday 18th November Chinnerys, Southend
Tuesday 20th November Phoenix Theatre, Exeter
Wednesday 21st November Waterfront, Norwich
Thursday 22nd November Wedgewood Rooms, Portsmouth
Saturday 24th November Sugarmill, Stoke
Sunday 25th November Guildhall, Gloucester
Monday 26th November 02 Academy, Leicester
Wednesday 28th November Concorde 2, Brighton
Thursday 29th November Cockpit, Leeds
Friday 30th November Academy 2, Newcastle

Edited by user 27 September 2012 06:45:26(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

I promise to make you so alive that the fall of dust on furniture will deafen you. Nina Cassian
thanks 3 users thanked Linus Solanki for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 27/09/2012(UTC), Volturno on 27/09/2012(UTC), 68Pontiac on 30/09/2012(UTC)
Sponsor
Eimi  
#2 Posted : 27 September 2012 06:49:11(UTC)
Eimi

Rank: Member of the Movement

Groups: Registered
Joined: 29/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 688
Woman
Location: Japan

Thanks: 528 times
Was thanked: 875 time(s) in 688 post(s)
Quote:
What happens is people make you feel guilty about celebrating your legacy, and I was reading an interview last week from Phil Cunningham and Tom Chapman in the Japan Times, slagging me off for being a heritage act. And… I was like, but what are New Order?They’ve not even got the correct line up, they are a heritage act as well.

I actually phoned Phil Cunningham up after that, and he was like, for Tom Chapman, the new New Order bassist who spends his whole life emulating me , saying that I was a heritage act is like the pot calling the kettle black. What happened with me was, Factory, they reacted against it, they rounded on me and accused me of using the Factory legacy. From my point of view, I’d already lost Hacienda, when my mate offered me the opportunity to save the Factory building- which New Order paid for by the way- and it was a lovely building , even before anything else.

How can it be disgusting and horrible to play your own music? And what has always irritated me was, why, why is it disgusting and horrible to play Joy Division music when you are doing it as well? I got slagged off for doing Joy Division songs but we’ve had the biggest resurgence of ‘Madchester’ this year. So maybe I was ahead of the curve? The last time I saw the Stone Roses the Manager was paying people to go and see them. The next time I go there’s 250,000 for a new musician it must be really frustrating to watch us old farts never go….
NO have shown more willingness to potentially create something than The Light. They've only been touring these past hits for the past year or so, not at least a couple of years, like Hooky. So I'd say it's not exactly the same. And a lot of the things Hooky has done in the recent years besides touring The Light, has been nostalgia orientated. Bernard, on the other hand has collaborated with Blank and Jones in 2008, a new album with BL in 2009, and a collaboration with Hot Chip etc in 2010. So maybe people see Hooky as more 'nostalgic' for the past than Bernard. Also, with New Order's setlist, the newer songs are still from the past decade. The newest songs The Light are doing are about 30 years old. People may perceive The Light as more retro than New Order.
thanks 3 users thanked Eimi for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 27/09/2012(UTC), Baggie Boiler on 30/09/2012(UTC), Silvina Hernandez on 04/10/2012(UTC)
World Domination: Complete  
#3 Posted : 27 September 2012 07:12:44(UTC)
Baggie Boiler

Rank: Member with Technique

Groups: Registered
Joined: 24/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 793
Man
Location: in a house

Thanks: 894 times
Was thanked: 1022 time(s) in 811 post(s)
Can't wait for part 2 and to find out what his favorite cheese is Big Grin
Let's all wave our arms about !
thanks 1 user thanked Baggie Boiler for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 27/09/2012(UTC)
Linus Solanki  
#4 Posted : 27 September 2012 07:20:12(UTC)
Linus Solanki

Rank: Member of the Movement

Groups: Registered
Joined: 10/05/2012(UTC)
Posts: 629
Location: NYC

Thanks: 59 times
Was thanked: 1027 time(s) in 649 post(s)
So they still keep in touch with each other.

I actually phoned Phil Cunningham up after that, and he was like, for Tom Chapman, the new New Order bassist who spends his whole life emulating me , saying that I was a heritage act is like the pot calling the kettle black.
I promise to make you so alive that the fall of dust on furniture will deafen you. Nina Cassian
thanks 2 users thanked Linus Solanki for this useful post.
Baggie Boiler on 27/09/2012(UTC), ROCKET MICK on 27/09/2012(UTC)
Ruined in a day  
#5 Posted : 27 September 2012 09:09:59(UTC)
Ruined in a day

Rank: Young Offender

Groups: Registered
Joined: 25/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 27

Thanks: 7 times
Was thanked: 40 time(s) in 28 post(s)
Unfortunately Gillian never really quite filled the gap of Ian Curtis? Thank God that Freddie Mercury later joined. Hi
thanks 1 user thanked Ruined in a day for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 27/09/2012(UTC)
Andy  
#6 Posted : 29 September 2012 22:21:44(UTC)
Andy

Rank: Dead Soul

Groups: Registered
Joined: 24/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 2,218
Man
Location: Seaside, California

Thanks: 1659 times
Was thanked: 3336 time(s) in 2238 post(s)
Linus Solanki wrote:
So they still keep in touch with each other.

I actually phoned Phil Cunningham up after that, and he was like, for Tom Chapman, the new New Order bassist who spends his whole life emulating me , saying that I was a heritage act is like the pot calling the kettle black.


I've not been one to paint Hooky as the absolute villian regarding his split with the rest of New Order. But to hear him say Chappy is spending "his whole life emulating me" and referring to the current incarnation of New Order as a "Peter Hook tribute band" really reveals how difficult it must be to deal with his ego. One wouldn't think that someone with such an immense and respected body of work could be capable of drowning it all out. Unfortunately, that appears to be what's happening as he continues to cry over the milk that he himself spilled.
thanks 3 users thanked Andy for this useful post.
Eimi on 29/09/2012(UTC), Baggie Boiler on 29/09/2012(UTC), ROCKET MICK on 01/10/2012(UTC)
Eimi  
#7 Posted : 29 September 2012 23:21:24(UTC)
Eimi

Rank: Member of the Movement

Groups: Registered
Joined: 29/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 688
Woman
Location: Japan

Thanks: 528 times
Was thanked: 875 time(s) in 688 post(s)
A few other thoughts about what he's said in this interview.

I don't think Tom Chapman has spent his entire life emulating Hooky. Even with this lineup of New Order, I don't think he's completely copying Hooky either. I'm sure there are some New Order fans and people in general who would be open to the possibility of New Order making new music. Maybe not everyone, but maybe some. The Hacienda was going to fail sooner or later the way they were doing the business. Why obsess over it? It's been 15 years since that club closed! If he wanted to save the building that his new club is now in, and learn from past business mistakes to make a new club, fine. But why name it FAC251: The Factory? Why couldn't he name it something else and isn't related to Factory etc? It just cheapens the legacy. By the way, Tinie Tempah etc aren't real house music, just watered down crap for the masses. ( I've heard some house songs from the recent years as well as early 90s house music from UK & Italy, and those are real house songs as opposed to what he's talking about.) Also, I'm sure quite a few Oasis fans have heard of the Beatles.

And New Order are not a Peter Hook tribute band. I don't hate Hooky personally; I just dislike arrogance, egotism, exaggeration, and not being dignified to the press.

Edited by user 30 September 2012 04:13:36(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

thanks 3 users thanked Eimi for this useful post.
Baggie Boiler on 30/09/2012(UTC), ROCKET MICK on 01/10/2012(UTC), Silvina Hernandez on 04/10/2012(UTC)
markreed  
#8 Posted : 30 September 2012 08:45:36(UTC)
markreed

Rank: Member of the Republic

Groups: Registered
Joined: 02/05/2012(UTC)
Posts: 229
Location: Somewhere, GB

Thanks: 3 times
Was thanked: 353 time(s) in 229 post(s)
Quite egotistic some of these responses.

Undignified pop at Tom. I don't know, but Hooky would up in arms if Tom played just like him, and up in arms if he didn't. If Tom had long hair, a bass slung round his knees and said gruff things between songs he might be accused to emulating Hooky. Tom no more emulates Hooky than Fritz Hilpert emulates Wolfgang Flur, or Jon Carin emulates Rick Wright. Different musician playing the same songs.

Whats with all these pops at Gillian? If Hooky didn't like her he had 20 years to sack her.

The obtuse reference to critical voices as trolls is disrespectful. I'd say it to his face if he wanted. Hooky seems to think he owns the music and his opinion is the only one that matters.

As for the True Faith remix not having any bass on it, Shep Pettibones mix has it in spades. Also, to be fair, the Regret remix strips out the bass, drums, guitar, and most of the keyboards apart from the piano line. Almost every remix of the time was like that.
thanks 3 users thanked markreed for this useful post.
Baggie Boiler on 30/09/2012(UTC), Eimi on 30/09/2012(UTC), ROCKET MICK on 01/10/2012(UTC)
68Pontiac  
#9 Posted : 30 September 2012 09:31:30(UTC)
68Pontiac

Rank: Young Offender

Groups: Registered
Joined: 28/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 47
Location: Murrieta, California

Thanks: 13 times
Was thanked: 53 time(s) in 47 post(s)
markreed wrote:
Quite egotistic some of these responses.

Undignified pop at Tom. I don't know, but Hooky would up in arms if Tom played just like him, and up in arms if he didn't. If Tom had long hair, a bass slung round his knees and said gruff things between songs he might be accused to emulating Hooky. Tom no more emulates Hooky than Fritz Hilpert emulates Wolfgang Flur, or Jon Carin emulates Rick Wright. Different musician playing the same songs.

Whats with all these pops at Gillian? If Hooky didn't like her he had 20 years to sack her.

The obtuse reference to critical voices as trolls is disrespectful. I'd say it to his face if he wanted. Hooky seems to think he owns the music and his opinion is the only one that matters.

As for the True Faith remix not having any bass on it, Shep Pettibones mix has it in spades. Also, to be fair, the Regret remix strips out the bass, drums, guitar, and most of the keyboards apart from the piano line. Almost every remix of the time was like that.


Though I agree he doesn't need to slag off Tom, as its no easy job to do what he does... I can see Hooky's point. To him, NO are him Barney and Steve. All others are late comers. I can see how he would be rubbed the wrong way when Tom and Phil talk negatively about him and his project as they are true late comers (and one Hooky probably doesn't even recognize as NO, and is only a stand-in).

Its not like Gillian could fill the shoes of Ian, and he is referencing how they once had someone to direct them to make music and when Ian died, they didn't have that anymore. Don't see it as such a pop at Gillian as you do, only a true statement.

As for his statement to trolls, aren't you special... how is it you take it personally? I think everyone feels the same way about trolls on the internet, don't think Hooky is alone on his thoughts there... or are you a troll and don't like the comments?

As for the remix, he even stated it was part of the time and that it really isn't Barney's "fault" but at the same time you can see how anyone would be slighted if their addition to great music was discarded, repackaged and then played on tour.



Hooky has not been the best at watching himself over social media, but I see no real issues with this interview. I think this is a great one he had. Amazing how some have a hate for Hooky so much that they will pick apart anything to find something to be angry about....
thanks 1 user thanked 68Pontiac for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 01/10/2012(UTC)
markreed  
#10 Posted : 30 September 2012 10:45:02(UTC)
markreed

Rank: Member of the Republic

Groups: Registered
Joined: 02/05/2012(UTC)
Posts: 229
Location: Somewhere, GB

Thanks: 3 times
Was thanked: 353 time(s) in 229 post(s)
68Pontiac wrote:
markreed wrote:
Quite egotistic some of these responses.

Undignified pop at Tom. I don't know, but Hooky would up in arms if Tom played just like him, and up in arms if he didn't. If Tom had long hair, a bass slung round his knees and said gruff things between songs he might be accused to emulating Hooky. Tom no more emulates Hooky than Fritz Hilpert emulates Wolfgang Flur, or Jon Carin emulates Rick Wright. Different musician playing the same songs.

Whats with all these pops at Gillian? If Hooky didn't like her he had 20 years to sack her.

The obtuse reference to critical voices as trolls is disrespectful. I'd say it to his face if he wanted. Hooky seems to think he owns the music and his opinion is the only one that matters.

As for the True Faith remix not having any bass on it, Shep Pettibones mix has it in spades. Also, to be fair, the Regret remix strips out the bass, drums, guitar, and most of the keyboards apart from the piano line. Almost every remix of the time was like that.


Though I agree he doesn't need to slag off Tom, as its no easy job to do what he does... I can see Hooky's point. To him, NO are him Barney and Steve. All others are late comers. I can see how he would be rubbed the wrong way when Tom and Phil talk negatively about him and his project as they are true late comers (and one Hooky probably doesn't even recognize as NO, and is only a stand-in).

Its not like Gillian could fill the shoes of Ian, and he is referencing how they once had someone to direct them to make music and when Ian died, they didn't have that anymore. Don't see it as such a pop at Gillian as you do, only a true statement.

As for his statement to trolls, aren't you special... how is it you take it personally? I think everyone feels the same way about trolls on the internet, don't think Hooky is alone on his thoughts there... or are you a troll and don't like the comments?

As for the remix, he even stated it was part of the time and that it really isn't Barney's "fault" but at the same time you can see how anyone would be slighted if their addition to great music was discarded, repackaged and then played on tour.

Hooky has not been the best at watching himself over social media, but I see no real issues with this interview. I think this is a great one he had. Amazing how some have a hate for Hooky so much that they will pick apart anything to find something to be angry about....


I don't think he's talking about me. If he egosurfs plenty of people dislike his current business plan and say much worse things elsewhere.

Good point about Gillian. Never saw it that way, myself. Hooky has said far unkinder things in other interviews about her. Seems a shame to me.
thanks 2 users thanked markreed for this useful post.
Eimi on 30/09/2012(UTC), ROCKET MICK on 01/10/2012(UTC)
Eimi  
#11 Posted : 30 September 2012 19:16:49(UTC)
Eimi

Rank: Member of the Movement

Groups: Registered
Joined: 29/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 688
Woman
Location: Japan

Thanks: 528 times
Was thanked: 875 time(s) in 688 post(s)
68Pontiac wrote:
markreed wrote:

Though I agree he doesn't need to slag off Tom, as its no easy job to do what he does... I can see Hooky's point. To him, NO are him Barney and Steve. All others are late comers. I can see how he would be rubbed the wrong way when Tom and Phil talk negatively about him and his project as they are true late comers (and one Hooky probably doesn't even recognize as NO, and is only a stand-in).

Its not like Gillian could fill the shoes of Ian, and he is referencing how they once had someone to direct them to make music and when Ian died, they didn't have that anymore. Don't see it as such a pop at Gillian as you do, only a true statement.

As for his statement to trolls, aren't you special... how is it you take it personally? I think everyone feels the same way about trolls on the internet, don't think Hooky is alone on his thoughts there... or are you a troll and don't like the comments?

As for the remix, he even stated it was part of the time and that it really isn't Barney's "fault" but at the same time you can see how anyone would be slighted if their addition to great music was discarded, repackaged and then played on tour.

Hooky has not been the best at watching himself over social media, but I see no real issues with this interview. I think this is a great one he had. Amazing how some have a hate for Hooky so much that they will pick apart anything to find something to be angry about....


I don't think he's talking about me. If he egosurfs plenty of people dislike his current business plan and say much worse things elsewhere.

Good point about Gillian. Never saw it that way, myself. Hooky has said far unkinder things in other interviews about her. Seems a shame to me.


If that's how Hooky feels about Gillian, then that's a shame. Because to me, the 'classic' (so to speak) line up of New Order, would be Bernard, Hooky, Steve, and Gillian. I'm sure I'm not the only person who thinks that way too. Maybe Gillian's contributions were different from album to album. Maybe she contributed more in the mid to late 80s than in 1981. But still, the way he doesn't seem to think she mattered at all, is something I really disagree with. She wasn't a supporting member. She wasn't a touring member. She wasn't a tea-maker for the band. She was (back then) and is (now) a full-time member of the group. And like I have posted in this thread, there are small bits of things he says to the media that I disagree with.

Disagreeing doesn't mean hate. I normally try to not pick apart people's interviews... but when he claims Tom has been emulating Hooky all his life, I disagree with that. When he claims he's not using the Factory legacy, I disagree (the new club's name has something to do with it...why can't he move on and name the club something entirely new?) When he talks about older bands and claims how Oasis fans generally don't know who the Beatles are....I disagree (I'm sure quite a few Oasis fans are old enough to know who they are, and at least in my country, The Beatles are one of the few older bands from abroad that young people know about). When he keeps claiming that he doesn't see a problem with himself playing JD tunes when the others are doing it too...he's missing the point. It's all about how you play the tunes....New Order playing a few JD tunes at the end of their set, is not the same as JD album tours. Even more so with Bad Lieutenant. Bad Lieutenant played some new songs, with a few older ones mixed in the set. That's different than JD album tours.

Edited by user 30 September 2012 19:17:30(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

thanks 1 user thanked Eimi for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 01/10/2012(UTC)
Coops  
#12 Posted : 01 October 2012 00:52:27(UTC)
Coops

Rank: Member of the Brotherhood

Groups: Registered
Joined: 25/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 448
Location: Xiberia

Thanks: 34 times
Was thanked: 611 time(s) in 456 post(s)
"...Tom Chapman, the new New Order bassist who spends his whole life emulating me..."

See, that dude who started the Hooky Defence thread thing ought to read this if he's struggling to understand why people are pissed off with him. To me, that quote is a nasty, snidey and twattish thing to say. Who the fuck would want to emulate Hooky?

I know people like that in real life but give them a wide berth as they're cunts.
thanks 3 users thanked Coops for this useful post.
Eimi on 01/10/2012(UTC), ROCKET MICK on 01/10/2012(UTC), JG on 02/10/2012(UTC)
Mr_D1sco  
#13 Posted : 01 October 2012 01:11:36(UTC)
Mr_D1sco

Rank: Young Offender

Groups: Registered
Joined: 01/10/2012(UTC)
Posts: 25
Location: Portland, OR.

Was thanked: 32 time(s) in 28 post(s)
Coops wrote:
"...Tom Chapman, the new New Order bassist who spends his whole life emulating me..."

See, that dude who started the Hooky Defence thread thing ought to read this if he's struggling to understand why people are pissed off with him. To me, that quote is a nasty, snidey and twattish thing to say. Who the fuck would want to emulate Hooky?

I know people like that in real life but give them a wide berth as they're cunts.


Could he perhaps have been responding to this??

"I think there will be new material," says Chapman "and the exciting thing is that there is going be a new chapter in New Order. There has to be new music, otherwise you just become a heritage act. Just like Peter Hook."
thanks 1 user thanked Mr_D1sco for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 01/10/2012(UTC)
steven  
#14 Posted : 01 October 2012 06:16:50(UTC)
steven

Rank: Young Offender

Groups: Registered
Joined: 08/08/2012(UTC)
Posts: 30
Location: london

Thanks: 26 times
Was thanked: 40 time(s) in 30 post(s)
thanks 1 user thanked steven for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 01/10/2012(UTC)
68Pontiac  
#15 Posted : 01 October 2012 19:06:27(UTC)
68Pontiac

Rank: Young Offender

Groups: Registered
Joined: 28/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 47
Location: Murrieta, California

Thanks: 13 times
Was thanked: 53 time(s) in 47 post(s)
Mr_D1sco wrote:
Coops wrote:
"...Tom Chapman, the new New Order bassist who spends his whole life emulating me..."

See, that dude who started the Hooky Defence thread thing ought to read this if he's struggling to understand why people are pissed off with him. To me, that quote is a nasty, snidey and twattish thing to say. Who the fuck would want to emulate Hooky?

I know people like that in real life but give them a wide berth as they're cunts.


Could he perhaps have been responding to this??

"I think there will be new material," says Chapman "and the exciting thing is that there is going be a new chapter in New Order. There has to be new music, otherwise you just become a heritage act. Just like Peter Hook."


This is EXACTLY what I was referring to. I find it amazing how all blame seems to jump to Hooky, but in reality we wouldn't have any of the touring we are having (whether it be the Light or NO) without his departure.
I mentioned it before that NO was reformed really as Barney's way of sticking back to Hooky for touring and doing the JD albums. Hooky left because he wanted to tour, sing old classic material and the rest of the band wouldn't hear of it. Can you blame Hooky for getting tired of doing the same old sets over and over and never revisiting the older music? Can you blame him in leaving when he wanted to take JD and NO and tour it, and have fun, and the rest of the band didn't? Can you also blame him that NO is only doing what they are doing (partly what he was fighting for) only because he left?
Barney has just as much blood on his hands on this break up, but he is not as vocal so the vultures are sparing him. Steve isn't much better, as he had every ability to be the middle man, yet he didn't. Doing nothing is doing something. Steve could have taken Tony's place of mediator after he passed, but he didn't.

While it is difficult to be in Tom's position, and I feel for him, he does have some balls stating something like that, and its not surprising if Hooky has a visceral reaction to it.

As for Gillian's position, I don't think anyone really thinks she has equal footing with Barney, Hooky and Steve. I still see her as a founding member, but her additions to the band/music really aren't prominent (and not there for the majority of the life of the band)... you have to know what you are looking for. She wasn't an Ian Curtis, and that was Hooky's point earlier.
The argument really should be between Hooky, Barney and Steve and let them sort it out. Toma nd Phil really should take a backseat on this....

Edited by user 01 October 2012 19:08:03(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

thanks 1 user thanked 68Pontiac for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 02/10/2012(UTC)
Andy  
#16 Posted : 01 October 2012 20:21:42(UTC)
Andy

Rank: Dead Soul

Groups: Registered
Joined: 24/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 2,218
Man
Location: Seaside, California

Thanks: 1659 times
Was thanked: 3336 time(s) in 2238 post(s)
68Pontiac wrote:
Mr_D1sco wrote:
Coops wrote:
"...Tom Chapman, the new New Order bassist who spends his whole life emulating me..."

See, that dude who started the Hooky Defence thread thing ought to read this if he's struggling to understand why people are pissed off with him. To me, that quote is a nasty, snidey and twattish thing to say. Who the fuck would want to emulate Hooky?

I know people like that in real life but give them a wide berth as they're cunts.


Could he perhaps have been responding to this??

"I think there will be new material," says Chapman "and the exciting thing is that there is going be a new chapter in New Order. There has to be new music, otherwise you just become a heritage act. Just like Peter Hook."


This is EXACTLY what I was referring to. I find it amazing how all blame seems to jump to Hooky, but in reality we wouldn't have any of the touring we are having (whether it be the Light or NO) without his departure.
I mentioned it before that NO was reformed really as Barney's way of sticking back to Hooky for touring and doing the JD albums. Hooky left because he wanted to tour, sing old classic material and the rest of the band wouldn't hear of it. Can you blame Hooky for getting tired of doing the same old sets over and over and never revisiting the older music? Can you blame him in leaving when he wanted to take JD and NO and tour it, and have fun, and the rest of the band didn't? Can you also blame him that NO is only doing what they are doing (partly what he was fighting for) only because he left?
Barney has just as much blood on his hands on this break up, but he is not as vocal so the vultures are sparing him. Steve isn't much better, as he had every ability to be the middle man, yet he didn't. Doing nothing is doing something. Steve could have taken Tony's place of mediator after he passed, but he didn't.

While it is difficult to be in Tom's position, and I feel for him, he does have some balls stating something like that, and its not surprising if Hooky has a visceral reaction to it.

As for Gillian's position, I don't think anyone really thinks she has equal footing with Barney, Hooky and Steve. I still see her as a founding member, but her additions to the band/music really aren't prominent (and not there for the majority of the life of the band)... you have to know what you are looking for. She wasn't an Ian Curtis, and that was Hooky's point earlier.
The argument really should be between Hooky, Barney and Steve and let them sort it out. Toma nd Phil really should take a backseat on this....


There seems to be a lot of speculation on your part regarding the band members' artistic contributions, ambitions and political roles/motives within the group.
thanks 1 user thanked Andy for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 02/10/2012(UTC)
68Pontiac  
#17 Posted : 01 October 2012 21:14:56(UTC)
68Pontiac

Rank: Young Offender

Groups: Registered
Joined: 28/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 47
Location: Murrieta, California

Thanks: 13 times
Was thanked: 53 time(s) in 47 post(s)
Andy wrote:
68Pontiac wrote:
Mr_D1sco wrote:
Coops wrote:
"...Tom Chapman, the new New Order bassist who spends his whole life emulating me..."

See, that dude who started the Hooky Defence thread thing ought to read this if he's struggling to understand why people are pissed off with him. To me, that quote is a nasty, snidey and twattish thing to say. Who the fuck would want to emulate Hooky?

I know people like that in real life but give them a wide berth as they're cunts.


Could he perhaps have been responding to this??

"I think there will be new material," says Chapman "and the exciting thing is that there is going be a new chapter in New Order. There has to be new music, otherwise you just become a heritage act. Just like Peter Hook."


This is EXACTLY what I was referring to. I find it amazing how all blame seems to jump to Hooky, but in reality we wouldn't have any of the touring we are having (whether it be the Light or NO) without his departure.
I mentioned it before that NO was reformed really as Barney's way of sticking back to Hooky for touring and doing the JD albums. Hooky left because he wanted to tour, sing old classic material and the rest of the band wouldn't hear of it. Can you blame Hooky for getting tired of doing the same old sets over and over and never revisiting the older music? Can you blame him in leaving when he wanted to take JD and NO and tour it, and have fun, and the rest of the band didn't? Can you also blame him that NO is only doing what they are doing (partly what he was fighting for) only because he left?
Barney has just as much blood on his hands on this break up, but he is not as vocal so the vultures are sparing him. Steve isn't much better, as he had every ability to be the middle man, yet he didn't. Doing nothing is doing something. Steve could have taken Tony's place of mediator after he passed, but he didn't.

While it is difficult to be in Tom's position, and I feel for him, he does have some balls stating something like that, and its not surprising if Hooky has a visceral reaction to it.

As for Gillian's position, I don't think anyone really thinks she has equal footing with Barney, Hooky and Steve. I still see her as a founding member, but her additions to the band/music really aren't prominent (and not there for the majority of the life of the band)... you have to know what you are looking for. She wasn't an Ian Curtis, and that was Hooky's point earlier.
The argument really should be between Hooky, Barney and Steve and let them sort it out. Toma nd Phil really should take a backseat on this....


There seems to be a lot of speculation on your part regarding the band members' artistic contributions, ambitions and political roles/motives within the group.


Sumner reveals. "Without us, he was selling Unknown Pleasures T-shirts with... he couldn't use Joy Division on it, so it says 'Manchester Unknown Pleasures'. When we [New Order] were getting back together, we just thought, 'If he's doing that, what are we doing holding back?' So that showed us the way."

Hooky's complaints were quite public on why he left... so its not speculation... Barney's statement really agrees that they brought the band back together to spite Hooky...
thanks 1 user thanked 68Pontiac for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 02/10/2012(UTC)
CTB  
#18 Posted : 01 October 2012 21:16:53(UTC)
CTB

Rank: Member of the Village

Groups: Registered
Joined: 29/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 58
Location: Australia

Thanks: 15 times
Was thanked: 109 time(s) in 59 post(s)
Andy wrote:

There seems to be a lot of speculation on your part regarding the band members' artistic contributions, ambitions and political roles/motives within the group.


Spot on - some of the stuff being said here is based on supposition at best, and then these guesses get further stretched to fit a conclusion that is stated above. Who here really knows that NO 'reforming' was to 'stick it back to Hooky'? They didn't reform, he left - that much is known, the rest is speculation. If you have proof to support what you say about the band politics, state your source instead of making an assumption and posting it here as fact.

Barney has 'blood on his hands'? And even Steve earns himself a disapproving finger-waggle for not being a middle-man in an imagined scenario. If you want to defend Hooky's position, go ahead - but it's just daft to make up scenarios to justify your position.
thanks 3 users thanked CTB for this useful post.
JG on 02/10/2012(UTC), ROCKET MICK on 02/10/2012(UTC), Eimi on 02/10/2012(UTC)
NotAMod  
#19 Posted : 02 October 2012 03:08:48(UTC)
NotAMod

Rank: Moderator

Groups: Moderators, Administrators, Registered
Joined: 24/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 671
Location: London, UK

Thanks: 180 times
Was thanked: 1105 time(s) in 673 post(s)
68Pontiac wrote:
Can you blame Hooky for getting tired of doing the same old sets over and over


To be fair, that is exactly what he and The Light have been doing since 2010.

Unknown Pleasures has been toured for over 2 years now with mostly the same sets. There were occasional Closer and Still shows but the default setting seems to be Unknown Pleasures. Personally, I'm not fond of repetitive setlists either but it's clearly something both bands are doing but from different pools of material. Making out that Hooky has broken free of playing the same stuff every night is somewhat disingenuous as he's merely playing different stuff over and over now.

New Order are at one end of the legacy while Hooky's at the other end.

That's their respective choice.

Edited by user 02 October 2012 03:48:59(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

thanks 1 user thanked NotAMod for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 02/10/2012(UTC)
JG  
#20 Posted : 02 October 2012 03:56:41(UTC)
JG

Rank: Member of the Brotherhood

Groups: Registered
Joined: 02/06/2012(UTC)
Posts: 282
Location: LDN

Thanks: 134 times
Was thanked: 418 time(s) in 289 post(s)
Mr_D1sco wrote:
Coops wrote:
"...Tom Chapman, the new New Order bassist who spends his whole life emulating me..."

See, that dude who started the Hooky Defence thread thing ought to read this if he's struggling to understand why people are pissed off with him. To me, that quote is a nasty, snidey and twattish thing to say. Who the fuck would want to emulate Hooky?

I know people like that in real life but give them a wide berth as they're cunts.


Could he perhaps have been responding to this??

"I think there will be new material," says Chapman "and the exciting thing is that there is going be a new chapter in New Order. There has to be new music, otherwise you just become a heritage act. Just like Peter Hook."


It's not that long (although it seems to have been forgotton) since Hook accused Tom of miming to Round & Round on stage (a misguided view provided by ill-informed members of this parish). When the performance of that track was just the same as when Hook was in the band. For one professional musician to accuse another of this, in public, is pretty low. I think most folk can understand the motivation for a little nibble back, given the opportunity. And whatever issues Hook has with Bernard which drives him to make such bitter remarks, none of these have been generated by Tom.

Always worth remembering a little bit of context.



thanks 1 user thanked JG for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 02/10/2012(UTC)
Bill  
#21 Posted : 02 October 2012 04:30:39(UTC)
Bill

Rank: Member with Substance

Groups: Registered
Joined: 28/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 1,303
Man
Location: UK

Was thanked: 1611 time(s) in 1339 post(s)
thanks 1 user thanked Bill for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 02/10/2012(UTC)
CTB  
#22 Posted : 02 October 2012 05:42:46(UTC)
CTB

Rank: Member of the Village

Groups: Registered
Joined: 29/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 58
Location: Australia

Thanks: 15 times
Was thanked: 109 time(s) in 59 post(s)
I'm suspicious of the statements saying Joy Division never played Closer tracks live. Hooky's said this a few times in interviews now, and the facts don't bear this out - you could even compile a complete 'live' version of Closer performed by JD based entirely on tracks sourced from officially-released live albums, if you were that way inclined.

I realise JD were probably more heavily recorded/bootlegged than most bands in their brief existence, and that these recordings have been pretty heavily drawn upon for countless 'new' releases (Still, the fractured discs, H&S live disc et al.), but the statement is still dodgy; Closer was performed live, and some tracks like 24 Hours were amongst JD's most heavily repeated live tracks.


thanks 1 user thanked CTB for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 02/10/2012(UTC)
Jul  
#23 Posted : 02 October 2012 05:44:01(UTC)
Jul

Rank: Member of the Republic

Groups: Registered
Joined: 24/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 181
Location: Zagreb

Thanks: 711 times
Was thanked: 226 time(s) in 182 post(s)
Several points, I',m not sure who I'm replying to if anyone or even if it's the same thread. Nevertheless:

1) People are upset with Hooky behaving in a boorish, agressive, confrontational, twattish manner? When has he behaved in any other way, except now it's aimed at former bandmembers instead of the rest of the world? He had always played the agressive part, he just hasn't adapted well to the digital age (he seems to acknowledge it in this very interview).
2) Barney actually did say that Hooky playing full NO albums spurred him to reform New Order, in one of the gazillion interviews given since the reunion. It was an online interview, printed not video, can't remember which exactly right now.
3) Why on earth should Steve play the mediating part or any other part or anything apart from the drums is beyond me.
thanks 1 user thanked Jul for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 02/10/2012(UTC)
El Jarvo  
#24 Posted : 02 October 2012 07:01:40(UTC)
El Jarvo

Rank: Member of the Brotherhood

Groups: Registered
Joined: 01/05/2012(UTC)
Posts: 313
Location: No.18

Thanks: 4 times
Was thanked: 443 time(s) in 313 post(s)
CTB wrote:
I'm suspicious of the statements saying Joy Division never played Closer tracks live. Hooky's said this a few times in interviews now, and the facts don't bear this out - you could even compile a complete 'live' version of Closer performed by JD based entirely on tracks sourced from officially-released live albums, if you were that way inclined.


I always read this as him saying Joy Division never played Closer once it came out. They never got chance to 'tour it' the way bands traditionally do with any new release.

Curtis killed himself before the album was released.

thanks 1 user thanked El Jarvo for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 03/10/2012(UTC)
markreed  
#25 Posted : 02 October 2012 10:35:53(UTC)
markreed

Rank: Member of the Republic

Groups: Registered
Joined: 02/05/2012(UTC)
Posts: 229
Location: Somewhere, GB

Thanks: 3 times
Was thanked: 353 time(s) in 229 post(s)
Difficult to play material when your singer is dead. He could always get Ian Astbury in.

The idea that Gillian was absent for the majority of the time is incorrect. She was in the band from 1980-2000 and again from 2011 onwards. A 10 year absence, when the band themselves were officially inactive / split for 5 of those years, is not much.
thanks 2 users thanked markreed for this useful post.
Eimi on 02/10/2012(UTC), ROCKET MICK on 03/10/2012(UTC)
Users browsing this topic
Guest (7)
2 Pages12>
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF 2.1.1 | YAF © 2003-2024, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 2.170 seconds.