logo
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Michael Monkhouse  
#1 Posted : 30 November 2017 02:43:18(UTC)
Michael Monkhouse

Rank: Guilty Partner

Groups: Registered
Joined: 03/06/2012(UTC)
Posts: 1,998
Location: Rome

Thanks: 61 times
Was thanked: 2410 time(s) in 2004 post(s)
With two retro (see what etc) threads I'd be interested in your opinions on the WORST remix. It'd have to be one of London's shameless cash-ins for me... Probably the 5 identical Shite 'n' Robbie RIADs (does ANYONE like them?), though Hawtwin's BM always sent me to sleep and the World dubs were filler spin-offs too.
Then there were the ones that had sweet Fairground Attracition with the original except a token line (sometimes not even that): Tartman's BLT, CJBollock's Temptation, Lioncock's three totally-and-utterly-unlike-1963 1963s.
It winds me up to think how much beer and porn money I wasted back then in the name of completion. So I don't do it.
I can't comment on the MC mixes as my obsessive phase was well and truly over, and I don't thnk the tracks needed mixing.
PS And how could I forget Razormaid? Just chop the songs up and repeat buts so they lose structure. Actually, don't.

Edited by user 30 November 2017 05:51:12(UTC)  | Reason: Specified

thanks 1 user thanked Michael Monkhouse for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 02/12/2017(UTC)
Sponsor
50 Pound Note  
#2 Posted : 30 November 2017 08:06:05(UTC)
50 Pound Note

Rank: Member of the Republic

Groups: Registered
Joined: 24/09/2015(UTC)
Posts: 174
Location: San Francisco

Thanks: 4 times
Was thanked: 274 time(s) in 174 post(s)
To be fair, Razormaid was a remix service for DJs, with tracks edited to have cleaner intros and outros for mixing in clubs. They're also re-edits and very rarely involved any actual remixing. Those were never commercially available, so they shouldn't count.

Ruined In A Day remixes by Sly & Robbie, for sure.
I also hate most of the new remixes on The Rest Of. The mid-90s were a terrible time for dance music.
thanks 3 users thanked 50 Pound Note for this useful post.
VanGelder on 30/11/2017(UTC), Rorschach on 01/12/2017(UTC), ROCKET MICK on 02/12/2017(UTC)
negative1  
#3 Posted : 30 November 2017 10:08:32(UTC)
negative1

Rank: Member with Substance

Groups: Registered
Joined: 24/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 1,150

Thanks: 865 times
Was thanked: 1660 time(s) in 1152 post(s)
the razormaid remixes of subculture (well the ones without the extra female vocalist) are better than the official mixes, and i like the official mixes.

later
-1
thanks 2 users thanked negative1 for this useful post.
Rorschach on 01/12/2017(UTC), ROCKET MICK on 02/12/2017(UTC)
50 Pound Note  
#4 Posted : 30 November 2017 11:48:45(UTC)
50 Pound Note

Rank: Member of the Republic

Groups: Registered
Joined: 24/09/2015(UTC)
Posts: 174
Location: San Francisco

Thanks: 4 times
Was thanked: 274 time(s) in 174 post(s)
Originally Posted by: negative1 Go to Quoted Post
the razormaid remixes of subculture (well the ones without the extra female vocalist) are better than the official mixes, and i like the official mixes.


I'm shocked, but I actually agree with you.

That's Debora Iyall from Romeo Void (Never Say Never, A Girl In Trouble (Is A Temporary Thing)) doing the additional vocals.

A version of that remix was made commercially available through Record Mirror magazine.

I grew to love the 12" version over time, but John Robie really made it undanceable by shifting the bassline by a 16th note. I love that the current live version uses both basslines, creating a fuller effect.

Edited by user 30 November 2017 11:49:16(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

thanks 2 users thanked 50 Pound Note for this useful post.
Rorschach on 01/12/2017(UTC), ROCKET MICK on 02/12/2017(UTC)
Michael Monkhouse  
#5 Posted : 01 December 2017 10:30:06(UTC)
Michael Monkhouse

Rank: Guilty Partner

Groups: Registered
Joined: 03/06/2012(UTC)
Posts: 1,998
Location: Rome

Thanks: 61 times
Was thanked: 2410 time(s) in 2004 post(s)
I liked the Record Mirror take because it was an extended version with lotsa Hooky as opposed to an overpaid DJ's ego trip à la Rest Of.
The first time I heard Razormaid it was the 586 mix on https://www.discogs.com/...Decadence/release/581280 . There was bugger all (my priest's hobby) Internet or new stuff so I was quite chuffed to get a new mix. When I actually heard it I thought it was balls and anyone could do that with time and equipment. Same goes for all the other ones I've heard (Getting Away with Shit, Perfect kiss etc). No wonder I stopped being a collector.
thanks 1 user thanked Michael Monkhouse for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 02/12/2017(UTC)
LostSiren  
#6 Posted : 01 December 2017 15:14:12(UTC)
LostSiren

Rank: Member of the Republic

Groups: Registered
Joined: 01/08/2013(UTC)
Posts: 176
Location: Boston

Thanks: 31 times
Was thanked: 218 time(s) in 176 post(s)
the Gabriel and Dresden Voco Tech Lemon Sasquatch Flywheel mix (or whatever the F it is) of Someone Like You. Why I continue to have it in my iTunes s beyond me.
thanks 1 user thanked LostSiren for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 02/12/2017(UTC)
Michael Monkhouse  
#7 Posted : 03 December 2017 01:53:22(UTC)
Michael Monkhouse

Rank: Guilty Partner

Groups: Registered
Joined: 03/06/2012(UTC)
Posts: 1,998
Location: Rome

Thanks: 61 times
Was thanked: 2410 time(s) in 2004 post(s)
Originally Posted by: Michael Monkhouse Go to Quoted Post
5 identical Shite 'n' Robbie RIADs (does ANYONE like them?)


Looks like someone does... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NPTv6kdfjlI
thanks 2 users thanked Michael Monkhouse for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 03/12/2017(UTC), VanGelder on 05/12/2017(UTC)
perspexorange  
#8 Posted : 03 December 2017 06:03:25(UTC)
perspexorange

Rank: Dead Soul

Groups: Registered
Joined: 20/10/2013(UTC)
Posts: 2,251
Location: Salop

Thanks: 454 times
Was thanked: 3451 time(s) in 2251 post(s)
Yeah, my vote would definitely go with the atrocious Sly & Robbie RIAD remixes. They are, hands down, the worst official product to come out with the New Order name on it. All IMHO, naturally.

I remember feeling very ripped off when I bought that 2nd CD. Why anyone would think the average NO fan would want one 'ragga' style mix, let alone five practically identical ones.

I'm guessing that the band commissioned S&R to do five remixes and they decided to cut corners, basically producing one remix, with five variations. The band, or their management, in typical NO fashion (especially in 1993) decided they couldn't be arsed to complain.

Here's hoping S&R only got paid for one remix.

Edited by user 03 December 2017 06:04:37(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

thanks 1 user thanked perspexorange for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 03/12/2017(UTC)
Johnny James  
#9 Posted : 04 December 2017 02:50:18(UTC)
Johnny James

Rank: Member of the Brotherhood

Groups: Registered
Joined: 29/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 439
Location: UK

Was thanked: 954 time(s) in 439 post(s)
Originally Posted by: perspexorange Go to Quoted Post

I'm guessing that the band commissioned S&R to do five remixes and they decided to cut corners, basically producing one remix, with five variations. The band, or their management, in typical NO fashion (especially in 1993) decided they couldn't be arsed to complain.

Here's hoping S&R only got paid for one remix.


It doesn't really work like that, remixers tend to be asked to deliver variations, such as dubs and instrumentals and maybe a radio edit or a 'TV' version with main vocal dropped out.

I'm sure Sly and Robbie didn't intend for London to use most of what they delivered.

thanks 2 users thanked Johnny James for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 04/12/2017(UTC), perspexorange on 04/12/2017(UTC)
Ken Doherty  
#10 Posted : 04 December 2017 06:07:05(UTC)
Ken Doherty

Rank: Member of the Brotherhood

Groups: Registered
Joined: 31/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 313
Man
Location: London

Thanks: 114 times
Was thanked: 383 time(s) in 313 post(s)
I know I bought the CD single of Ruined In A Day but haven't listened to it for at least 20 years, and have no memory of Sly & Robbie remixes , so personally I'd pick:

BLT (the Armand Van Helden mix), Ruined In A Day (the K-Klass remix) and Tutti Frutti (the Hot Chip remix), all piss poor and seem to go on forever without any redeeming features.
thanks 1 user thanked Ken Doherty for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 04/12/2017(UTC)
Isi  
#11 Posted : 04 December 2017 10:59:37(UTC)
Isi

Rank: Young Offender

Groups: Registered
Joined: 02/05/2012(UTC)
Posts: 25

Thanks: 29 times
Was thanked: 29 time(s) in 25 post(s)
The bad ones...
RIAD Bogle mixes, getting Sly and Robbie in 1981 to remix NO would have been special, but what were they thinking in 1993?
BLT Armand Van Helden mix - this has to be a phoned in AVH cast-off with Barney's voice spliced in
1963 mixes (Lionrock and Joe T. Vanelli), although Vanelli's mix is quite funny at least - "johnny"!
60MPH who's idea was it to get the superman lovers? laughable mix
the krafty mixes are hookless and boring

But worst of all has to be the cash grab Complete Music set, I didn't bother buying it. New order never stooped to pointlessly extended mixes in their prime. Even R&R, which has an extended intro, is a complete rerecording and not extended for the sake of it. It's the sort of thing every other 80s band got up to to milk the fans. At least with a remix by an outsider you can take or leave their take on it.

In defence of...
TBTHOG (Biff & Memphis Remix) from Rest Of... is good fun with that BM-style intro
the Someone Like You mixes work for me.
Jetstream is an odd one, because the original is so bad that nearly all the remixes are improvements

Edited by user 04 December 2017 11:01:43(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

"I haven't time to sympathise, with all this nonsense and your lies"
thanks 1 user thanked Isi for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 04/12/2017(UTC)
Michael Monkhouse  
#12 Posted : 05 December 2017 05:53:24(UTC)
Michael Monkhouse

Rank: Guilty Partner

Groups: Registered
Joined: 03/06/2012(UTC)
Posts: 1,998
Location: Rome

Thanks: 61 times
Was thanked: 2410 time(s) in 2004 post(s)
Originally Posted by: Ken Doherty Go to Quoted Post
Ruined In A Day (the K-Klass remix)


WHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAT? That was the only decent thing about RIAD. It was even used for TOTP and Radio 1 Top 40.
RIAD was probably the beginning of the end for the collector. The Factory takes tended to be true to the original and if they didn't, they tended to be worthwhile and the band sometimes used them live. Think GTM Groove or FEB 12"... Even Regret wasn't too bad. Apart from K-Klass, RIAD ''''''''''boasted'''''''''' Radio Edit / Ambient (both acceptable but filler), Sly 'n' Robbie (aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaarrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrgggggggghhhhhhhhhhh) and VC (filler but acceptable). Worst of all, London spread them out so punters had to buy all the formats. It pissed me off to hear all this Paul Borely BS about how 'even on a major label, they could do WTF they liked.'
I quite liked Vanelli's 1963 but as I've said, I was desperate for new material and this was the closest it got i.e. completely different music AND the full vocal. Can't be arsed with it now.

Edited by user 05 December 2017 05:55:16(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

thanks 1 user thanked Michael Monkhouse for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 05/12/2017(UTC)
Debaser  
#13 Posted : 05 December 2017 07:50:33(UTC)
Debaser

Rank: Dead Soul

Groups: Registered
Joined: 03/06/2012(UTC)
Posts: 2,052
Location: here n there

Thanks: 486 times
Was thanked: 3005 time(s) in 2073 post(s)
Originally Posted by: Michael Monkhouse Go to Quoted Post
... WORST remix. It'd have to be one of London's shameless cash-ins for me... Probably the 5 identical Shite 'n' Robbie RIADs (does ANYONE like them?)


Originally Posted by: Music Complete Go to Quoted Post
Ruined In A Day remixes by Sly & Robbie, for sure.


Originally Posted by: perspexorange Go to Quoted Post
Yeah, my vote would definitely go with the atrocious Sly & Robbie RIAD remixes. They are, hands down, the worst official product to come out with the New Order name on it.


Originally Posted by: Isi Go to Quoted Post
The bad ones...
RIAD Bogle mixes, getting Sly and Robbie in 1981 to remix NO would have been special, but what were they thinking in 1993?

Seems to be a theme here, and this was the first thing I thought of when I saw the thread title, so you can add me to the list. I seem to recall other people offering similar opinions on these mixes in older posts too. I'm guessing if we were to run a Best to Worst NO Remixes poll (a bit like the Slicing Up Eyeballs thingy) Sly & Robbie would rank pretty highly as one of the worst.


Originally Posted by: Michael Monkhouse Go to Quoted Post
Originally Posted by: Ken Doherty Go to Quoted Post
Ruined In A Day (the K-Klass remix)

WHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAT? That was the only decent thing about RIAD.


I agree with Monkhouse (!). I think this may even fit into "Remixes Better Than The Original" territory. Although I would probably agree with Mr D that it (the full length version) goes on a bit. So the K Klass radio edit is the one.

Originally Posted by: Michael Monkhouse Go to Quoted Post
I quite liked Vanelli's 1963 but as I've said, I was desperate for new material and this was the closest it got i.e. completely different music AND the full vocal. Can't be arsed with it now.


Dont forget those Lionrock "The Excellence of Dance" remixes. They bore even less ralation to 1963 than Vanelli's Dubby mix. I actually quite like this Lionrock remix in terms of being a banging tech-house track with a nod to Kraftwerk. But I don't think there's any New Order in there. Maybe they did an "Aphex Twin" and went: oh shit we forgot to remix new order, let's just hand the courrier something we made earlier.



I only ever bought CD1 of 1963, partly because I was pissed off that they were re-hashing (and not improving) one of my fave B-sides, and partly because purchasing CD2 and the vinyl along with CD1 made the whole thing kinda expensive. So I'm actually listening to Joe T Vanelli's Light Mix for the first time ever, right now. It makes a little bit more (new order-y) sense to me than the dubby mix that I'm familiar with.
Ooh Saxophone! Is that meant to be a synthetic tuba sound farting it's way through the track? Also the percussion overdub (1.30-ish) sounds like it might have been sampled from TBTHOG.







thanks 2 users thanked Debaser for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 05/12/2017(UTC), Isi on 06/12/2017(UTC)
Michael Monkhouse  
#14 Posted : 05 December 2017 08:39:04(UTC)
Michael Monkhouse

Rank: Guilty Partner

Groups: Registered
Joined: 03/06/2012(UTC)
Posts: 1,998
Location: Rome

Thanks: 61 times
Was thanked: 2410 time(s) in 2004 post(s)
There were three Lioncock 1963s and none of them had anything whatsoever to do with the original, even by Rest Of standards. To be fair, they were OK in their own right, but still a total and utter fucking rip-off cos they were released under the NO banner. EVERYONE who bought them was shelling out for a new spin on a strong NO track, and this wasn't it.
The strange thing about Rest Of is exactly half the mixes were OK but it was the half that'd already been released as singles (TF, Rep, BM 95). The 'new' ones were half-arsed repeats (EGG, AOC, Touched) or DJ ego trips (Temptation, Confusion, BLT).
It's amazing that between their very public split after Reading and their very pubic return, we were fobbed off with 12 rehashes... Yet they remain respected. If Simply Red pulled such a cunning stunt, they'd be massacred.
93 Spooky
94 TF, Best Of UK
95 1963, Best Of US, BM, Rest Of, LWTUA, Permanent
96 EGG Advent
97 Heart and Soul, Video 586

Edited by user 08 December 2017 00:36:22(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

thanks 1 user thanked Michael Monkhouse for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 05/12/2017(UTC)
Ken Doherty  
#15 Posted : 11 December 2017 03:32:57(UTC)
Ken Doherty

Rank: Member of the Brotherhood

Groups: Registered
Joined: 31/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 313
Man
Location: London

Thanks: 114 times
Was thanked: 383 time(s) in 313 post(s)
Originally Posted by: Michael Monkhouse Go to Quoted Post
Originally Posted by: Ken Doherty Go to Quoted Post
Ruined In A Day (the K-Klass remix)


WHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAT? That was the only decent thing about RIAD. It was even used for TOTP and Radio 1 Top 40.
RIAD was probably the beginning of the end for the collector. The Factory takes tended to be true to the original and if they didn't, they tended to be worthwhile and the band sometimes used them live. Think GTM Groove or FEB 12"... Even Regret wasn't too bad. Apart from K-Klass, RIAD ''''''''''boasted'''''''''' Radio Edit / Ambient (both acceptable but filler), Sly 'n' Robbie (aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaarrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrgggggggghhhhhhhhhhh) and VC (filler but acceptable). Worst of all, London spread them out so punters had to buy all the formats. It pissed me off to hear all this Paul Borely BS about how 'even on a major label, they could do WTF they liked.'
I quite liked Vanelli's 1963 but as I've said, I was desperate for new material and this was the closest it got i.e. completely different music AND the full vocal. Can't be arsed with it now.


So, after the kerfuffle above, I listened to it again for the first time in God knows how many years, and yep, its still shite - a bit of subpar 'Balearic guitar' noodling, like something off Now Thats What I Call Cafe Del Mar vol. 73 and some shit, 'will this do?' drum programming, had to switch it off after 30 or seconds.
thanks 1 user thanked Ken Doherty for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 11/12/2017(UTC)
Michael Monkhouse  
#16 Posted : 12 December 2017 10:30:49(UTC)
Michael Monkhouse

Rank: Guilty Partner

Groups: Registered
Joined: 03/06/2012(UTC)
Posts: 1,998
Location: Rome

Thanks: 61 times
Was thanked: 2410 time(s) in 2004 post(s)
THREE likes and WHAT a comment... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PdGHwdZ8rkQ
I guess he's right, this IS the best on the 2nd CD, but that's a bit like being asked which member of League of Gentlemen you'd most like to bone.
Does he really say 'Wit me wet dream an me wumman'?
I forgot the even worse Phased and Dazed RIAD on https://www.discogs.com/...he-Remix/release/7706942 - at least Bogle DID something; this just washes the plodding original from one earphone to - that's right. In fact I didn't even consider it as it can't possibly be an official mix - just the CD compiler's way to con hard core fans by persuading them there was something unique on the purchase. Cack, cack, cack.

Edited by user 14 December 2017 03:01:36(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

thanks 1 user thanked Michael Monkhouse for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 13/12/2017(UTC)
Alexey Fyodorovich  
#17 Posted : 01 January 2018 17:49:06(UTC)
Alexey Fyodorovich

Rank: Candidate

Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/10/2015(UTC)
Posts: 21
Location: Los Angeles

Thanks: 9 times
Was thanked: 29 time(s) in 20 post(s)
This opinion might be rare, but I thought Sly and Robbie did a good job on the Ruined in a Day remix and I enjoy the Bogle mix. Never-the-less, I thought it was a terrible idea to fill a CD with 5 nearly identical versions (no pun intended) of the same remix and I think that affected many people's opinion of that mix. I also thought the Hawtin remix of Blue Monday was pretty good too; it would have been great to have it included on the 12" for the 1995 re-release instead of the '88 version.

I'm not sure what New Order's worst remix was, but I thought there were WAY too many remixes of Spooky. The Fluke edit, 12" and dub versions were good, but they went way overboard with the remixes on the limited edition CD and only one or two of them are decent. I prefer quality over quantity and liked the way singles were marketed in the 1980s where you had just a 7" with edits of the a and b sides, a 12" with extended versions and maybe a 2nd 12" with an outside remixer.
thanks 1 user thanked Alexey Fyodorovich for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 02/01/2018(UTC)
Michael Monkhouse  
#18 Posted : 02 January 2018 00:57:48(UTC)
Michael Monkhouse

Rank: Guilty Partner

Groups: Registered
Joined: 03/06/2012(UTC)
Posts: 1,998
Location: Rome

Thanks: 61 times
Was thanked: 2410 time(s) in 2004 post(s)
OUCH! You're right, though. maybe if there was just one Sly 'n' Wobble mix on the 12", people light've accepted it more easily. Paying for 5 versions was the real rip-off.
Hawtwin BM bored me shitles. Again, it was a con cos it was the only exclusive on the 95 BM remix LP.
Always had a soft spot for Spooky Stadium - what the original should've sounded like without Hague's NICE production. Minimix was good too, but maybe it was done to death with Max and Mouli.
thanks 1 user thanked Michael Monkhouse for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 02/01/2018(UTC)
EmileStrunz  
#19 Posted : 02 January 2018 06:14:42(UTC)
EmileStrunz

Rank: Young Offender

Groups: Registered
Joined: 23/08/2013(UTC)
Posts: 38
Location: Leicester

Thanks: 12 times
Was thanked: 60 time(s) in 38 post(s)
Can't believe that the Martin Buttrich remix of EGG hasn't been made commercially available. Well, actually I can believe it. I think it's one of their best remixes in years. It sounds like Barney re-recorded the vocal too.
thanks 2 users thanked EmileStrunz for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 02/01/2018(UTC), Rorschach on 04/01/2018(UTC)
Michael Monkhouse  
#20 Posted : 02 January 2018 06:50:04(UTC)
Michael Monkhouse

Rank: Guilty Partner

Groups: Registered
Joined: 03/06/2012(UTC)
Posts: 1,998
Location: Rome

Thanks: 61 times
Was thanked: 2410 time(s) in 2004 post(s)
It's the same mentality that puts Freebass' The Tower on Myspace for a billisecond, but makes that horrible EP easier to find than an alcoholic student.
thanks 1 user thanked Michael Monkhouse for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 02/01/2018(UTC)
Michael Monkhouse  
#21 Posted : 03 January 2018 06:38:29(UTC)
Michael Monkhouse

Rank: Guilty Partner

Groups: Registered
Joined: 03/06/2012(UTC)
Posts: 1,998
Location: Rome

Thanks: 61 times
Was thanked: 2410 time(s) in 2004 post(s)
From the above comments (especially Alexey Fyodorovich's), I'd say the real issue with Shite and Bobbie is how London milked 'em. People in this digital free-for-all age forget, but back in 1993 there was a real sense of commitment and excitement in being a completist: traipse around record stores, track down rarities, lovingly unsheathe the produce and place it on the machine: in the case of RIAD CD 2, it just wasn't worth it! Maybe if they'd just had 'Dance Hall Groove' on the 12" B-side, the fans would be more kindly disposed: it's no one's favourite, but no worse than most of the bollocks London were churning out in 1995 either. At least it's a radical reworking (unlike the 94 swindles) and has the full vocal (95's)...
thanks 1 user thanked Michael Monkhouse for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 03/01/2018(UTC)
50 Pound Note  
#22 Posted : 03 January 2018 09:12:13(UTC)
50 Pound Note

Rank: Member of the Republic

Groups: Registered
Joined: 24/09/2015(UTC)
Posts: 174
Location: San Francisco

Thanks: 4 times
Was thanked: 274 time(s) in 174 post(s)
Originally Posted by: EmileStrunz Go to Quoted Post
Can't believe that the Martin Buttrich remix of EGG hasn't been made commercially available. Well, actually I can believe it. I think it's one of their best remixes in years. It sounds like Barney re-recorded the vocal too.


^^^^ THIS. It's my favorite proper remix they've ever done.

I love that the current live version of Bizarre Love Triangle is the one Stuart Price did at the same time. Wish they'd put EGG back in the set based on this remix.
thanks 1 user thanked 50 Pound Note for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 03/01/2018(UTC)
Rorschach  
#23 Posted : 03 January 2018 11:18:25(UTC)
Rorschach

Rank: Member of the Brotherhood

Groups: Registered
Joined: 25/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 260
Location: Salford

Thanks: 578 times
Was thanked: 369 time(s) in 258 post(s)
*scurries off to youtube*

*scurries back, smiling*

This is another fine example of why these boards cannot be allowed to die.

I'd never picked up on this brilliant old remix & had also missed out on the Richard X BLT until they put it in the live set, as I'd neither the money to buy nor facility to play 12x12 back in the day.

I'm definitely going to be listening to this new EGG for the next few days - thanks for the tip.
thanks 1 user thanked Rorschach for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 04/01/2018(UTC)
EmileStrunz  
#24 Posted : 03 January 2018 13:27:13(UTC)
EmileStrunz

Rank: Young Offender

Groups: Registered
Joined: 23/08/2013(UTC)
Posts: 38
Location: Leicester

Thanks: 12 times
Was thanked: 60 time(s) in 38 post(s)
Glad to be of assistance. I think that remix is so good - and is almost like an alternative version, rather than a remix, and as Music Complete rightly proposes, if they were to bring EGG back in to the live set, they should use this version.

Martin Buttrich is a fine techno artist in his own right, but what he did here was so respectful, yet funky and hard. The mix also has loads of space - some remixes through the kitchen sink in. This doesn't.
thanks 1 user thanked EmileStrunz for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 04/01/2018(UTC)
50 Pound Note  
#25 Posted : 04 January 2018 08:49:28(UTC)
50 Pound Note

Rank: Member of the Republic

Groups: Registered
Joined: 24/09/2015(UTC)
Posts: 174
Location: San Francisco

Thanks: 4 times
Was thanked: 274 time(s) in 174 post(s)
Post deleted - damn, my faulty memories! :)

Edited by user 04 January 2018 08:52:37(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

thanks 1 user thanked 50 Pound Note for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 04/01/2018(UTC)
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF 2.1.1 | YAF © 2003-2024, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 1.113 seconds.