Rank: Moderator
Groups: Moderators, Administrators, Registered Joined: 24/04/2012(UTC) Posts: 674 Location: London, UK
Thanks: 180 times Was thanked: 1111 time(s) in 675 post(s)
|
Yesterday saw the completely unexpected digital re-release of Minimal's Confusion Remixes from 1990. Available to buy here. There are some key differences: - The 'Con-om-fus-ars-ion Mix' is missing which is a shame as it was my favourite remix of the lot, - The 'Acappella' is completely different to the original 1990 version, - The 'Trip 1- Ambient Confusion' is also different to the original as it's now a vocal-less version of the 'Essential Mix', - The 'Confused Ooh-Wee Dub' is very different to the original 1990 but has some common elements (it's longer too), - The 'FVMSTR Remix' seems to be totally new, sounds like it was done recently. Nice to have some of these mixes in digital format. I can retire some of my crackly old vinyl to FLAC transfers. Discogs entry for the original vinyl. Thanks to Nick for the original spot.
|
2 users thanked NotAMod for this useful post.
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guilty Partner
Groups: Registered
Joined: 03/06/2012(UTC) Posts: 1,998 Location: Rome
Thanks: 61 times Was thanked: 2410 time(s) in 2004 post(s)
|
Con-um-fus-arse-i-on used to be my favourite ever take, but it hasn't aged too well. Ditto TF Pet Shoppiboner.
|
1 user thanked Michael Monkhouse for this useful post.
|
|
|
Rank: Member of the Republic
Groups: Registered
Joined: 02/05/2012(UTC) Posts: 229 Location: Somewhere, GB
Thanks: 3 times Was thanked: 353 time(s) in 229 post(s)
|
This was the first version of the 1983 recording of Confusion that was released on CD, the DMC remix. I think it's a cracker, and should be much better known. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sqa2fbiYpRg
|
1 user thanked markreed for this useful post.
|
|
|
Rank: Member of the Republic
Groups: Registered
Joined: 29/04/2012(UTC) Posts: 243 Location: Adelaide
Thanks: 112 times Was thanked: 309 time(s) in 243 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: markreed Yep my favourite mix. Was that on one of those Volume compilations?
|
1 user thanked M1 for this useful post.
|
|
|
Rank: Member with Substance
Groups: Registered
Joined: 24/04/2012(UTC) Posts: 1,188
Thanks: 938 times Was thanked: 1779 time(s) in 1189 post(s)
|
listening to some of the new mixes, which are ok.
surprised they didn't just reissue the original. odd timing for it. and confusing (ha) that they kept some of the same mix names.
later -1
|
1 user thanked negative1 for this useful post.
|
|
|
Rank: Guilty Partner
Groups: Registered
Joined: 03/06/2012(UTC) Posts: 1,998 Location: Rome
Thanks: 61 times Was thanked: 2410 time(s) in 2004 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: M1 Originally Posted by: markreed Yep my favourite mix. Was that on one of those Volume compilations? https://www.discogs.com/...olume-One/release/104947https://www.discogs.com/...he-Remix/release/7706942
|
1 user thanked Michael Monkhouse for this useful post.
|
|
|
Rank: Member of the Republic
Groups: Registered
Joined: 16/02/2013(UTC) Posts: 194 Location: Australia
Thanks: 11 times Was thanked: 326 time(s) in 195 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: Michael Monkhouse I had it on this Best Of Volume. Plenty of early 90s electronic faves. What a time it was.
|
1 user thanked depthcharge for this useful post.
|
|
|
Rank: Member of the Brotherhood
Groups: Registered
Joined: 20/05/2012(UTC) Posts: 395 Thanks: 11 times Was thanked: 764 time(s) in 396 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: negative1 listening to some of the new mixes, which are ok.
surprised they didn't just reissue the original. odd timing for it. and confusing (ha) that they kept some of the same mix names.
later -1 Odd release this. Some tracks have mix titles from the original release, but are different mixes. Even the mixes with the correct titles are longer versions than on the 1990 12". Guess the mixes originally released were edited down a little. Having said that, the new versions sound warm and well mastered, just odd it's not the same versions! The perils of poorly labelled master tapes and labels not giving a careful listen to the original releases before "re-releasing" old stuff. Typical New Order, in other words! Edited by user 23 November 2016 14:38:20(UTC)
| Reason: Not specified
|
1 user thanked Mr Discography for this useful post.
|
|
|
Rank: Dead Soul
Groups: Registered
Joined: 02/08/2014(UTC) Posts: 2,659 Location: Down on the farm
Thanks: 680 times Was thanked: 3744 time(s) in 2660 post(s)
|
Oh , i do have that old 12" release from 1990.Probably haven't played it since about 1991.Maybe will dig it out and give it a spin.So some of these new mixes are longer /slightly different/massively different/ titles swapped around versions? Confusion indeed. There was a mix of Confusion on one of those old Volume compilation series? I do remember the series and have one of them on cassette from around 1993.It was a double cassette if i recall and came with a thick booklet that detailed all the artists and tracks. Edited by user 26 November 2016 11:33:24(UTC)
| Reason: Not specified
|
1 user thanked Fotz for this useful post.
|
|
|
Rank: Guilty Partner
Groups: Registered
Joined: 03/06/2012(UTC) Posts: 1,998 Location: Rome
Thanks: 61 times Was thanked: 2410 time(s) in 2004 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: Fotzepolitic
There was a mix of Confusion on one of those old Volume compilation series? I do remember the series and have one of them on cassette from around 1993.It was a double cassette if i recall and came with a thick booklet that detailed all the artists and tracks.
The one I linked above. I also come with thick booklets. It was also on NO The Remix, a bootleg CD I shelled out for in 95 https://www.discogs.com/...he-Remix/release/7706942 - the most memorable thing about said CD was RIAD Phased and Dazed, which is so fucking awful it makes Razormaid sound like Horny Lips-On. Just whoosh in and out of the original. Well worth buying. The others ones I ''''''''needed'''''''' it for were Sister Ray (Live 'n' Dangerous Mix - actually a live take I'd never heard so worthwhile), Paradise Bounty (acceptable) and BM DJOnlyClubMix, which was a totally bonkers reworking of Beach Buggy. The joys of being a collector.
|
1 user thanked Michael Monkhouse for this useful post.
|
|
|
Rank: Member of the Brotherhood
Groups: Registered
Joined: 29/04/2012(UTC) Posts: 451 Location: UK
Was thanked: 1045 time(s) in 451 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: Mr Discography Originally Posted by: negative1 listening to some of the new mixes, which are ok.
surprised they didn't just reissue the original. odd timing for it. and confusing (ha) that they kept some of the same mix names.
later -1 Odd release this. Some tracks have mix titles from the original release, but are different mixes. Even the mixes with the correct titles are longer versions than on the 1990 12". Guess the mixes originally released were edited down a little. Having said that, the new versions sound warm and well mastered, just odd it's not the same versions! The perils of poorly labelled master tapes and labels not giving a careful listen to the original releases before "re-releasing" old stuff. Typical New Order, in other words! It's not really down to the band, Minimal was Arthur Baker's label, now it seems to be under the control of someone else.
|
1 user thanked Johnny James for this useful post.
|
|
|
Rank: Member of the Republic
Groups: Registered
Joined: 24/07/2013(UTC) Posts: 123 Location: Tynemouth
Thanks: 37 times Was thanked: 148 time(s) in 123 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: Johnny James Originally Posted by: Mr Discography Originally Posted by: negative1 listening to some of the new mixes, which are ok.
surprised they didn't just reissue the original. odd timing for it. and confusing (ha) that they kept some of the same mix names.
later -1 Odd release this. Some tracks have mix titles from the original release, but are different mixes. Even the mixes with the correct titles are longer versions than on the 1990 12". Guess the mixes originally released were edited down a little. Having said that, the new versions sound warm and well mastered, just odd it's not the same versions! The perils of poorly labelled master tapes and labels not giving a careful listen to the original releases before "re-releasing" old stuff. Typical New Order, in other words! It's not really down to the band, Minimal was Arthur Baker's label, now it seems to be under the control of someone else. I guess it keeps the fan discographers busy ;) Which reminds me I've long had ambitions of setting up a wiki like http://nin.wiki to try and get a handle on the NO catalogue (and the Cure one for that matter), but haven't ever got around to it. The easiest way would be a Wikia but I really, really don't want to do that (bad experience with another wiki on their service which we eventually migrated of to http://doomwiki.org). So err, if I ever did, does this sound interesting to anyone else? Edited by user 28 November 2016 06:05:04(UTC)
| Reason: Not specified
|
1 user thanked Jonathan for this useful post.
|
|
|
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.